Mathey Tissot Calendar Chronograph

We discussed the Type XX on the Breguet forum and we had some exchanges on the fact that the Type XX was originally made by Mathey Tissot. Originally, that can be discussed, but the an indisputable fact is that Mathey Tissot made some. Two Sub Dials, which is my favorite, Three Sub Dials, which I ne

Hi all, Having been a watch addict and vintage watch collector for years I have developped some kind of watch routine. Some of my friends, family members or work colleagues find this anoying but anyway, I go my way...I wanted to share this here and invite you to do the same if you also have developp

Big size Chronograph ( 38 mm, which was, at that time, a considered as a big size ), Valjoux 22 inside, which obviously needs a good service. Late 40ies, or early 50ies, I cannot say, but not the kind of chronograph you will see everyday. Very much my taste, I must say... Best, Nicolas

Well, the case, case back, bezel are the same than the Type XX, as well as the Flyback movement ( Valjoux 222 ). The minute subdial , at 3 o clock is different, as it is not oversized, compared to the second subdial at 9 o' clock, as it shoukld be on a Type XX. Was it a special version, I don't thin

I have a watch. The dial says Mathey Tissot but case back and movement says Tissot (the other company) the movement looks to be a Omega 321 and I'm guessing the dial was changed (because the case and movement say Tissot) but the bridge where is says Tissot there is no serial number? can anyone help

Definitely, this Mathey Tissot has the allure of a great chronograph, with all the key codes of the timeless examples we know. A generous size for the Fifties ( somewhere between 37 and 38 mm ) A clean dial, where legibility is the most important point, with elegance. A Valjoux inside, like many oth