
Mach, a respected contributor, shares his hands-on impressions of the Chopard L.U.C Quattro Mark IV in platinum. His detailed account, complete with personal photography, offers a crucial real-world perspective on a watch that garnered significant attention at Watches and Wonders ’25. This article delves into Mach's experience, highlighting the nuances of this highly anticipated reference beyond official press releases.








But if I had walked out with one, the platinum would’ve been dangerously close to jumping on my wrist.
I feel this is a very nice release....but I feel the movement department can add just a little effort to invest in some nice angles. Sometimes I don't understand why, but I also agree with a recent article about LUC. Thanks for sharing and glad to see the lost time well spent. Wait....did you pick it home?
The movement is beautifully executed in many respects, but I can see how a few sharper angles or more architectural elements could elevate it even further. Still, for a 9-day power reserve, I think the overall execution is pretty remarkable. You mentioned a recent article about L.U.C. — curious which one you were referring to? I’ve read a few lately that echo similar thoughts: praising the technical merit and finishing while suggesting Chopard could lean a bit more into expressive movement desig
Substack Issue 163: Is there a more confusing brand than Chopard? Of course, most articles are subjective nowadays.
This thread is active on the Chopard forum with 31 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →