Girard-Perregaux 1966 Chronograph 49542 vs 49539
Collection

Girard-Perregaux 1966 Chronograph 49542 vs 49539

By crown comfort · May 21, 2017 · 30 replies
crown comfort
WPS member · Girard Perregaux forum
30 replies3302 views3 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

In this insightful comparison, 'crown comfort' shares a rare side-by-side look at two Girard-Perregaux 1966 Chronograph references, the 42mm and 40mm versions. This post offers valuable perspective on how subtle differences in case size, subdial placement, and dial elements can significantly impact a collector's preference. It underscores the importance of direct comparison for discerning enthusiasts.

30 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

Friends,

 

Last week I had the opportunity to take a side-by-side shot of my 42mm 1966 Chronograph and of the 40mm Chronograph. Something I had planned for a long time and finally was able to.

 

However, as with Murphy’s law, just that day, my camera was giving me big troubles and quite a few photos did not came out well. I managed one acceptable shot but unfortunately, the backside I cannot show.



 

I had previously laid out why I ended up with the 42mm version. Seeing them now again side-by-side, I’m happy to confirm my choice. The slightly bigger size, the better placed subdials and the applied Arabic numerals, by far weigh out the date window. I know for some the date is a no-go and I too would have preferred it without date (just imagine it with an enlarged applied 6 instead), but then again, the overall harmony of the other elements is something I really love.

 

So let’s have a closer look at the technical details:

 

 

42mm Chronograph:

 

40mm Chronograph:

Ref: 49542

49539

Case: 42mm, 12.53mm thick

40mm, 12.05 mm thick

Caliber: GP3300-0057: 11.5 ligne

57 Jewels and 46h PR

GP030C0, 10.5 ligne

38 Jewels and 36h PR

Versions:

only pink gold with white dial

Pink gold/white dial

White gold/white dial

White gold/blue dial

Special Dubail version

Strap: 21/16mm

20/16mm

 

 

The 49542 also wins the test on my wrist, just has more presence and better proportions in my view. Here are two older wristshots I took some time ago.



 





Hope that was informative and I look forward to your views, esp. from you militant no-date guys.

 

CC




About the Girard Perregaux Ref. 1966Chronograph

The Girard Perregaux 1966 Chronograph is a notable offering within the brand's classically styled 1966 collection, distinguished by its integrated chronograph function. This reference emphasizes traditional watchmaking aesthetics combined with a practical complication, positioning it as a more technically involved piece compared to time-only or simple date models within the same line. It represents Girard Perregaux's commitment to horological complications in a refined, understated package. The design adheres to the collection's established visual language, ensuring continuity while introducing enhanced functionality.

This particular iteration features a 40 mm case crafted from white gold, providing a substantial yet luxurious feel on the wrist. The watch is powered by an automatic mechanical movement, the GP03300-0064 caliber, which is visible through a sapphire case back. This movement offers a power reserve of approximately 46 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the dial, ensuring clarity and scratch resistance. The case dimensions contribute to a balanced presence, aligning with contemporary preferences for moderately sized chronographs.

For collectors, the 1966 Chronograph appeals to those seeking a sophisticated chronograph from a respected manufacture, without overt sporting pretensions. Its white gold case and classic design make it suitable for formal wear, while the chronograph complication adds a layer of horological interest. The choice of a display case back allows appreciation of the movement's finishing. This reference stands as a solid example of Girard Perregaux's capabilities in producing complicated watches with a focus on traditional design principles.

Specifications

Caliber
GP03300-0064
Case
White gold
Diameter
40 mm
Dial
Silver
Water Resist.
30 m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
XX
xxn
May 22, 2017
Obvious

alternative to a 5070

CR
crown comfort
May 22, 2017
It is an association you could have, however

I don't view the GP as an alternative. The 5070 is an icon in its own league and the GP 1966 Chronographs just competes in a different segment in my view. I think both have their place. Best, CC

AM
amanico
May 22, 2017
There is one big difference between the two... The superb manual winding movement of the 42 mm version.

Which would make me prefer the 42 mm version, if only it didn't have the date. Good idea to have taken these side by side pictures. I love the automatic for its dial, but the dial without a date on the 42 mm + a white metal version would make me fall in love, unconditionally. Best, Nicolas

CR
crown comfort
May 22, 2017
Need to disappoint you

but my 42mm Chronograph is Automatic too, the manual wind newer model is also 40mm, but has a very different look of the dial. How about this: The dial from the 42mm Automatic without date, in the 40mm case white gold and with the manual movement...?

AM
amanico
May 22, 2017
My bad!

This dial of yours, without date, 40 mm case, manual winding movement, and steel, white gold, platinum or why not... Tantalum case! Here is the 40 mm manual winding.

CR
crown comfort
May 22, 2017
Thanks for adding on the info on the manual wind Chrono. [nt]

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Girard Perregaux forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →