
Nicolas (amanico) introduces the highly anticipated Girard-Perregaux 1966 Chronograph with a manual-winding movement, a significant development for the brand. This article delves into the community's reception of this new caliber, comparing it to its automatic predecessor and other high-end chronographs.
The 1966 Ford Mustang represents a significant year for the model, building on the initial success of its introduction. This reference is part of the first generation, which established the Mustang as a distinct category of American automobile. It continued to offer a range of body styles and engine options, allowing for considerable personalization and appealing to a broad market segment. The 1966 model year saw refinements rather than radical changes, solidifying its design language and market position.
The vehicle's construction typically featured a steel unibody chassis. Various engine configurations were available, including inline-six and V8 options, paired with manual or automatic transmissions. Specific dimensions varied slightly depending on the body style, such as coupe, convertible, or fastback. The interior offered a functional layout, with instrumentation focused on driver information.
This reference holds interest for collectors due to its place in the early history of the Mustang and its enduring popularity. The availability of different engine and trim levels means that specific examples can vary widely in their features and performance. It remains a recognizable and sought-after classic, often celebrated at automotive events worldwide.
is without question , stunning. But .... The overall execution is a let down ... 1. The " Chronograph" on the dial spoils the dial for me 2. Speaking of the dial, the cleaner dial of the previous 1966 is more appealing to my eyes. 3. The applied hour markers is incoherent with the rest of the dial, again to my eyes 4. From the only caseback photo, the movment still looks "lost" in a 40mm case. 5. The case looks thick. So I am not sure how it wears on the wrist, ergonomically speaking. 6. The whi
Finally we can talk about it :) I find this last opus to be a significant improvement from the previous version, especially as movement is an important issue for me when considering a watch. I'm very glad they decided to move that way as it brings GP more clearly on the ground of high-end chronos. But I would also think the dial layout is less appealing to me compared to the automatic versions, even if I still like it that way (especially the black one). It definitely has a kind of 50's taste (s
Exactly what missed imho to Girard Perregaux, basic calibers are great, (still need a nice manual winding ) , the Grandes Complications are maybe the most amazing among all the great brands and so are the troubillons. Missed only medium complications ,and this chronograph fill the need perfectly and it seems wonderful as you can expect from Girard Perregaux. I am really happy for GP, the dial looks also stunning, people should rush on that one :) Maybe white metal, maybe world time added, many t
I don't think the case is too thick, at the contrary! As for your other comments, well, the date is my biggest concern. I think we need to see it in the flesh, indeed. Best, and thanks for your input! Nicolas
We dreamt to see it coming, now it is here. I don't think the Patek movement is " much " nicer than this one, though. But yes, I see it as a contender of the Lange 1815 Chrono and even closer, aesthetically, the Patrmony from Vacheron. We'll come back to it, I feel... Best, Nicolas
Excellent point Mark. This is encroaching on 1815 teritory, and will take quite a bit to swing a decision in favour of the GP.
This thread is active on the Girard Perregaux forum with 35 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →