Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Date SIHH 2019

amanico · 2019-04-24T09:55:11Z

Explore the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Date, its evolution, and the subtle design changes from 2014 to 2019. Get collector insights on this elegant JLC model.

amanico

WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum

19 replies5239 views8 photos

Amanico provides an insightful look into the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Date, tracing its evolution from its 2014 debut to the 2019 SIHH update. This post highlights the subtle yet significant design changes, particularly in case dimensions and dial aesthetics, that keep this elegant timepiece relevant for collectors.

19 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

The Master Ultra Thin Date first came in the catalogue in 2014, in rose gold, then, in 2015, in steel.

This watch had a 40 mm case, 7, 45 mm high.

We also had the Champagne dial, unveiled in 2016.

This year, Jaeger Lecoultre revisits this model.

With a smaller case, first, which is now 39 mm, a tad thicker: 7, 8 mm.

And with a redesigned dial, especially the indices, longer, and with a more subtle sunburst dial.

It is available in steel,

And in rose gold.

The movement is the same than the one which is housed in the former versions, the Cal 899, with a bit short power reserve of 38 hours and 28, 800 vibrations per hour.

My feelings? Jaeger Lecoultre gave some extra elegance and refinement to this watch. I regret the mention " automatique " once again, which I find totally unnecessary, and the date, as most often...

Looking forward to reading your comments and thoughts,

Best,

Nicolas

Key Points from the Discussion

The Master Ultra Thin Date is a strong contender among JLC's offerings, often causing collectors to deliberate between various models due to its compelling design and classic appeal.
The indices on the earlier 40mm MUT Date create a subtle 'circle within a circle' design when connected to the date window and applied logo, a detail preferred by some collectors over the newer iteration.
For some collectors, a power reserve indicator is essential for manually wound watches, making models without it less appealing, even if they appreciate the daily winding ritual.
The simpler the design, the more appealing the Master Ultra Thin line becomes to certain enthusiasts, emphasizing its minimalist elegance.
The Master Ultra Thin with a sub-seconds dial at 38.5mm is considered a particularly compelling version by some collectors.
A key question for potential buyers is when JLC will update the Master Ultra Thin Date movement to feature the brand's newer 70-hour power reserve.

The Discussion

Thomas_3

Apr 24, 2019

IWC. Patek, Rolex, Breitling etc I know which I would get. Every time I think I've decided which JLC to get I change my mind, with limited funds I can't get them all. The MUT is definitely one of my choices. I may have as much trouble when it comes time to pick out a Mont Blanc also.

amanico

Apr 24, 2019

The simpler, the better, for me, when it comes to the Master Ultra Thin... Best, Nicolas

proestak

Apr 24, 2019

when JLC will update the movement with the new 70h power reserve? Best Yiannis

eklektik

Apr 24, 2019

I really like my 8 days, but anything lower and without a power reserve indicator does not present much interest. I see it as the last fashion more than anything. I wind up my MUT everyday as I know I have to and I am fine with that. Best, É.

mahesh

Apr 24, 2019

in fact the MUT seconds sub-dial version st 38,5 mm - compelling version I guess ! Best, Mahesh.,

watchme

Apr 25, 2019

however I prefer the indices on my MUT Date 40mm. The 9 and 3 tips form a perfect circle when connected to the top of the date window and the bottom of the applied JL. A circle within a circle. It's subtle, but I measured it and it's truly sublime. -Dean

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 19 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Date SIHH 2019

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

More from this Forum