Collection
amanico presents a compelling comparison between the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin Perpetual in steel and white gold, highlighting the subtle yet significant differences in their dial finishes and overall aesthetic. This post invites collectors to consider how material choice impacts a watch's character, prompting a discussion on which version best embodies strength versus understatement.
Love the contrast of the WG version! :) Like the SS as well, but guess my eye sight needs more contrast due to age.... Best Blomman
I've got the opinion only JLC brand in steel is pure, as well as the design when the Classic is a simple difference in vision between the steel and white gold All the best
for me. The white gold is the one;) Thank you Nicolas, I'll PM my address! Cheers Francois
It\'s quite a long waitlist in the Singapore boutique being a special edition! I grabbed it when i had the chance the manufacture seems slow in producing the steel boutique special edition I think the contrast is ok enough to read My saying hi Nico Cheers Robin
.. That the strong ss one with those accented indices & dial, has something going for it.. But wait .. Not really, maybe: like the golden moon on the WG still better ! On the other hand, the budget thoughts might play a role, as well, which route to follow .. Best, still in a (slight) dilemma, if one were to go for the new PC.. hs
... it is the SS with the golden moon?
This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 29 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
