JLC Polaris 65 vs. Vulcain Cricket Nautical
Vintage

JLC Polaris 65 vs. Vulcain Cricket Nautical

By amanico · Mar 28, 2013 · 22 replies
amanico
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
22 replies7878 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

amanico presents a fascinating side-by-side comparison of two iconic alarm diving watches: the Jaeger-LeCoultre Polaris 65 and the Vulcain Cricket Nautical. This post delves into the shared design elements and historical context of these early pioneers in the alarm diver category, offering a unique perspective on their development and influence.

22 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
As we well know, the first Alarm Diving Watch was a Jaeger-Lecoultre, but not the one you are thinking about.

Indeed, it was not the Polaris, but the Deep Sea Alarm ( 1959 )

The second was not a Jaeger-Lecoultre, but a... Vulcain, the Cricket Nautical ( 1961 ), a watch I didn't have the pleasure to see in the real, till... Yesterday, when a good Purist and friend came in Paris wuth this marvel.

We also know that it was in 1963 that Jaeger-Lecoulte made the first protos of the Polaris, Protos which are very close to the Polaris 65, not to say identical.

Here are these two legands, side by side:



As you can see, the case ( Piquerez Super Compressor ) is the same, as well as the case back, which, on the Vulcain, always shows these famous 16 holes we don't systematically find on the Polaris 65, while they are systematically present on the Polaris 68.

The Vulcain Cricket Nautical case back:



One thing is sure: I have to get one, which I did already know, but seeing one in the flesh is a strong experience.

Best, and thanks to our Purist friend to have authorized me to take and post these pictures.

Nicolas

About the Jaeger-LeCoultre Memovox Ref. Polaris1965

The Memovox Polaris 1965 is a notable early iteration of Jaeger-LeCoultre's alarm-equipped diver's watch. This reference is distinguished by its triple-crown configuration and internal rotating bezel, a design that set it apart from other alarm watches of its era. It represents a significant development in the Memovox line, moving towards a more robust and purpose-built aesthetic while retaining the signature mechanical alarm function. The Polaris 1965 is recognized for its specific case construction and dial layout that differentiate it from subsequent Polaris models.

This particular reference features a stainless steel case, typically measuring 42mm in diameter, which was substantial for its time. It houses a self-winding mechanical movement, specifically the Jaeger-LeCoultre Caliber 825, known for its reliability and integrated alarm mechanism. The watch is fitted with a domed acrylic crystal, contributing to its vintage profile. The design prioritizes legibility and functionality, with a black dial providing contrast for the luminous markers and hands.

For collectors, the Memovox Polaris 1965 holds interest as an original example of the Polaris series. Its relatively limited production and distinctive design elements make it a sought-after piece. It appeals to those who appreciate the historical evolution of the Memovox line and the brand's early ventures into watches with enhanced water resistance and specialized functions. The Polaris 1965 is a foundational model within the broader Memovox family.

Specifications

Caliber
JLC 825
Case
Stainless Steel
Diameter
42mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
200m
Crystal
Acrylic

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AR
Ares501 - Mr Green
Mar 28, 2013
There is something

magical about that Vulcain dial Both amazing icons I would also like to have one Cricket ;) Thank you for another treat my friend Best D

AM
amanico
Mar 28, 2013
My tortured pleasure, my friend; ;)

WA
watchme
Mar 28, 2013
I was aware that the case maker...

at that time was the same for both models. I didn't know that the horns were exactly the same, or so they look in the picture. The only variation seems to be the crystal/bezel. Am I right? Also, both "buzzed," as (I believe) JLC hadn't invented the suspended gong yet, but the 2 watches sounded different - since the "Cricket" had its famous "chirp." -Dean

AM
amanico
Mar 28, 2013
The lugs are indeed the same, Dean.

The beze ans the crowns are indeed different, and the alarm " buzzes " in both case, but the tonality is more in the low register in the Polaris, yes. Best, Nicolas

DA
Dave G
Mar 28, 2013
So what do you think of the Vulcain tribute/reissue Nautical?

We have fondness for the Polaris Tribute pieces, but I think the Vulcain Nautical reissue seems quite nice and true to the original (although I've only seen photos). Dave

AM
amanico
Mar 28, 2013
I think it is an excellent offer from Vulcain, faithful to the original

And a must have if you own the original Cricket Nautical and / or the Tribute to Polaris. Something which crossed my mind more than once. Best, Nicolas

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →