Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso à Triptyque: A Three-Dial Horological Masterpiece
Complications

Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso à Triptyque: A Three-Dial Horological Masterpiece

By amanico · Feb 2, 2022 · 22 replies
amanico
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
22 replies1949 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Nicolas (amanico) shares an exclusive look at the Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso à Triptyque, a horological marvel he photographed at the Heritage Gallery. His post invites readers to appreciate the groundbreaking complexity of this three-dial timepiece, which set a new benchmark for the Manufacture and the industry at large. This article explores the enduring significance of such innovative designs in luxury watchmaking.

22 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Here is a photo I could take at the Heritage Gallery, some years ago: 




Mad, and almost impossible to wear on a normal wrist, this watch is another stroke of genius from the Manufacture, with its three dials. A first in the watch world. 

Till... Last year and the Quadriptyque. 

A watch I still have to see and photograph! 

Best,

Nicolas

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
J
J K
Feb 3, 2022
Thank you for sharing this unusual beast, Nicolas. I have never seen one. Dials resemble to me two faces. The one on the top looks a bit like Chaykin's Jocker. The bottom one (facing the opposite direction) looks like dog or (better) a polar bear ;)!

AM
amanico
Feb 3, 2022
LOL. I love your analogies!

BI
Bill
Feb 3, 2022
I am little confused. Three dial faces or two.

AL
Alfihar
Feb 3, 2022
Three… only…

The recto, the verso and the upper face of the « brancard ». Special Prize of the Jury of the Grand Prix d'Horlogerie de Genève 2007… Time flies… Best Ø

AM
amanico
Feb 3, 2022
Three faces, indeed, my friend. That's the magic of this watch.

AM
amanico
Feb 3, 2022
Yes, an admirable one.

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →