
cfn's unexpected encounter with a fellow Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Chronographe Rétrograde owner sparked a fascinating horological mystery. This article delves into cfn's investigation into why two watches of the same reference, serial numbers 208 and 413, exhibit a subtle yet significant difference in jewel count. His inquiry, even reaching a well-placed contact at JLC, uncovers insights into the evolution of this iconic caliber.



This chrono is raising my interest in the recently introduced steel model…which is worrisome for my wallet. But you make it look so good.👌🏽
Maybe movement update during model run? Odd because this was the only ref using this I'd believe (and the gransport?)? All I know, it's beautiful!
I adore this series of special reverso
…and the other owner was also aware of this but did also not have the explantion. Maybe there”s a WIS in here who knows? And as for the tribute, I honestly prefer this (original) version due to the better size (for me) and the ‘Arret/Marche’ indicator on the front. Claus
Did they win or lose a jewel with time? Best, E.
That would technically mean these two watches aren't exactly the same caliber!!! I never knew this detail! Wow! Thanks for sharing! And what a pleasure for the eyes to see two very rare twins together! Is the other owner also here on WatchProSite? If not, you must recruit him or her!
This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 37 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →