
In a captivating thread, saile, a seasoned collector, shares his exciting dilemma of choosing between an A. Lange & Söhne Odysseus and a Triple Split. His post sparks a lively discussion among enthusiasts, delving into the nuances of Lange's allocation strategy and the perceived desirability of these highly sought-after references. This article explores the community's insights on exclusivity, reliability, and the true value of acquiring such horological masterpieces.

If I want both I need to order another piece.
telling you what you can and can't have is absurd.
Cute to see Lange play hard to get. Won’t last IMO.
This new requirement may work for Lange. We all know Lange makes a wonderful watch. And well people want what they can't have that's just human nature. Personally, I would much rather add another Lange than an AP jumbo or a FP Journe CB at there current market values.
Exclusivity, limit the number of pieces that go on the gray market, limit the number of people that buy from ADs, limit the number of discounts customers get. It’s possible that they can no longer make enough pieces to satisfy both boutique and AD demand so they rather funnel the traffic to their own points of sales. It’s also possible that they prefer sitting on their watches and sell them at 100% through their points of sale instead of through ADs.
I recently bought a ZW date, a decided on the Odysseus. I wonder if I should’ve gotten the TS. Don’t forget the L1 QP Salmon too!
This thread is active on the A. Lange & Söhne forum with 39 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →