
Clueless_Collector's post highlights a fascinating horological creation that immediately sparks discussion about design originality and brand identity. This piece, with its distinctive dual-escapement architecture, prompts collectors to consider the fine line between homage and imitation in high-watchmaking. The community's responses delve into the aesthetic appeal and the underlying philosophy of such independent designs, making it a valuable read for those interested in the evolving landscape of luxury timepieces.
but impressive timepiece (s) though, 1 of each.

2 timezones makes a lot of sense with two escapements. I would pick this over Legacy Machine N°2.
If these drop like other Arnold and son would really tempt me
I can not ignore i like it. The sameness with MBandF is tru. Back to the title i use, my collecting style is to do only one dial watches. A gmt by this of two clocks in one, both separated, looks great, albeit it have a dial and crown to much. I do not need to know a time on another continent, or want to know summer and winter time at one look. But the fun factor and style is perhaps a good reason to change, would you let such a juicy watch alone because it have an own design language? My own an
I agree this is a nicel watch, with all the bells and whistles.
Most likely already allocated.
My eyes’ trying to search for MB&F in the article as my brain works that way but I’m puzzled. I’m not a fan of copy cats and think this is lazy designers at work.
This thread is active on the Independents forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →