
Amanico's insightful review of the Montblanc Meisterstück Heritage Pulsograph from SIHH 2014 offers a critical look at Montblanc's horological aspirations. His detailed analysis of the watch's design, movement, and branding strategy provides a valuable historical snapshot of the brand's efforts to establish itself in high watchmaking, challenging perceptions and highlighting the Villeret workshop's significant contributions.
As of today, 60 Montblanc listings are live on the eBay market and 32 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.
.... for many reasons. 1st because it feels like a 5170J had sex with a 5170G, a duometre ( for the case ), a 5205 (for the hands) and the diamond on the side is like a 3rd eye on the front of that alien. The dial is clearly inspired by the 5170J, pulsometer of the 5170G, the sunburst dial of the texture is a way of correcting that cold plaster feel of the patek. The duometre inspired case, is a very smart move, as its the nicest JLC case IMO, and slimmer here, which is one of the weak points of
I really don't like the way the 2 subdials are located on the Patek, Under the 3 / 9 line. Therefore, the subdials on the Patek eat the pulosmetric scale, which is an aberration for a " doctor's Watch "... To end, are you sure Patek didn't find the " inspiration " of the 5170 dial on other vintage watches, and not only Pateks? I am sure that if we dig a bit, we could find some aesthically close dials on some VC, UN and other vintages... The diamond between the lugs at 6 o clock? That was not man
... we need a dial that cheers up, not sad lower sub-dials :) Now on the other hand, Patek is clearly inspired by her own vintage models, 130, 530, 1436.... Which is the logical when we have a long heritage. Its all legit here, its in every new Patek, always have roots in the past, and innovating, etc... you know the drill Now as you know, the fine line between being inspired by a model and copying it is always thin and debatable. Problem here, is that there is absolutely no reference in their p
They have two ways to take. The roots of an horological brand such as Minerva, with some very interesting things, and the mad way... They have to work on, but I am pretty confident Jérôme Lambert and the whole Montblanc Team will reach the identity point in a strong way. Best, Nicolas
Dear Nicolas, I wish you were (or will be) right but when you see that Mr Lambert already introduced an "Extreme Lab" design at Montblanc and even uses Villeret movements for it, I am not sure we can be so confident... Come on, how can you make a so-called conceptual carbon watch with this kind of old school Villeret movements, it is ridiculous. At least at JLC they made kind of "titanium/carbon/oil free" movements for the Extreme Lab. Mr Lambert already made all kind of unrelated watches at JLC
Was it all good during the last 13 years at JLC? Certainly not. Was it good to see diversity back to JLC? Without doubt, yes. Do brands have to stick with their past? I don't think so. First because most of the brands have to do some " commercial " watches to fund the research and development on watches which make us happy. Then because they have to adapt themselves, and to feed some ( necessary ) creaitivity. Back to Montblanc, now, and especially, the Chrono 100... Is it ridiculous to see a Vi
This thread is active on the Montblanc forum with 50 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →