
Amanico's insightful review of the Montblanc Meisterstück Heritage Pulsograph from SIHH 2014 offers a critical look at Montblanc's horological aspirations. His detailed analysis of the watch's design, movement, and branding strategy provides a valuable historical snapshot of the brand's efforts to establish itself in high watchmaking, challenging perceptions and highlighting the Villeret workshop's significant contributions.
.... for many reasons. 1st because it feels like a 5170J had sex with a 5170G, a duometre ( for the case ), a 5205 (for the hands) and the diamond on the side is like a 3rd eye on the front of that alien. The dial is clearly inspired by the 5170J, pulsometer of the 5170G, the sunburst dial of the texture is a way of correcting that cold plaster feel of the patek. The duometre inspired case, is a very smart move, as its the nicest JLC case IMO, and slimmer here, which is one of the weak points of
I really don't like the way the 2 subdials are located on the Patek, Under the 3 / 9 line. Therefore, the subdials on the Patek eat the pulosmetric scale, which is an aberration for a " doctor's Watch "... To end, are you sure Patek didn't find the " inspiration " of the 5170 dial on other vintage watches, and not only Pateks? I am sure that if we dig a bit, we could find some aesthically close dials on some VC, UN and other vintages... The diamond between the lugs at 6 o clock? That was not man
Funny as I also thought the case looks like the Duometre. Which is of course, here, a compliment. As you did, I could also handle a Villeret not long ago and could then really understand what these timepieces represent and where they stand in the Chronographs' hall of fame. This is a very elegant oufit, inside a 50's styling package. I love it. The little doubt I have is about the look of the metalic dial. Only the real experience will tell more about that matter. There is still a little element
... we need a dial that cheers up, not sad lower sub-dials :) Now on the other hand, Patek is clearly inspired by her own vintage models, 130, 530, 1436.... Which is the logical when we have a long heritage. Its all legit here, its in every new Patek, always have roots in the past, and innovating, etc... you know the drill Now as you know, the fine line between being inspired by a model and copying it is always thin and debatable. Problem here, is that there is absolutely no reference in their p
It's beautiful. The case is not to be underrated. I really like the size and proportions. Is the caseband brushed? I cannot quite tell but I think so; another detail I very much enjoy. I kind of like the pusher where it is instead of in the crown. There is a certain charm to it. But I see it perfectly acceptable either way. Your idea of a black dial with white metal... yes. I also agree on the need to disconnect from the pens in name. 10 more years like this for MB the watchmaker and I will forg
They have two ways to take. The roots of an horological brand such as Minerva, with some very interesting things, and the mad way... They have to work on, but I am pretty confident Jérôme Lambert and the whole Montblanc Team will reach the identity point in a strong way. Best, Nicolas
This thread is active on the Montblanc forum with 50 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →