Patek Philippe 5960P vs 5140P Comparison
Discussion

Patek Philippe 5960P vs 5140P Comparison

By TomasEriksson · Jan 16, 2026 · 30 replies
TomasEriksson
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
30 replies2064 views2 photos
f ๐• in ๐Ÿ’ฌ โœ‰ ๐Ÿ”—

TomasEriksson, a respected voice in the Patek Philippe community, ignited a compelling discussion by contemplating a significant trade: his Patek Philippe Ref. 5960P for a Ref. 5140P. His query delves into the nuanced considerations of daily wearability, the romantic allure of a perpetual calendar, and the subjective definition of an 'upgrade' within high horology. This article synthesizes the community's diverse perspectives, offering valuable insights for collectors weighing similar decisions.


So I currently have a 5960p and is concidering trading it towards a 5140p. Main reasons being the smaller and slimmer 5140 makes it a better daily wearer but I also like the romantic part of wearing a perpetual calendar. Thoughts? Does everyone agree that the 5140p is upgrade?

Attached are pictures of me wearing my 5960 and trying to 5140.





About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5960

The Patek Philippe Complications reference 5960A, introduced in stainless steel, represents a significant offering within the brand's annual calendar chronograph series. This particular reference is notable for being the first annual calendar chronograph from Patek Philippe to be offered in a non-precious metal, making it a distinctive piece in the Complications collection. It combines practical complications with a robust case material, appealing to collectors seeking a blend of utility and horological complexity.

This reference features a 40.5mm stainless steel case, housing the self-winding Caliber CH 28-520 QA 24H. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours and is visible through a sapphire crystal case back. The dial is presented in white, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The integrated stainless steel bracelet complements the case material, providing a cohesive aesthetic.

The 5960A in stainless steel holds a specific position for collectors due to its material choice and the integrated bracelet, differentiating it from its precious metal counterparts. Its combination of an annual calendar and chronograph functions, along with the 24-hour indication, makes it a highly functional and mechanically interesting timepiece. The special hand set and case back decoration mentioned for this specific 5960A further emphasize its unique attributes within the production run.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal.CH 28-520 QA 24H
Case
stainless steel
Diameter
40.5mm
Dial
white
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
MI
Miles_151
Jan 16, 2026

For me certainly not an upgrade but a sideways change. Both special in their own way but the 5960p 1st edition for me will always feel a special milestone for Patek and the companies history. M.

TO
TomasEriksson
Jan 16, 2026

Thank you for your input!

GA
gary_g
Jan 16, 2026

But honestly they are all great. Just a matter of what you like.

TO
TomasEriksson
Jan 16, 2026

You have a point, Annual calendar + chrono is definetly a nice mix of complications so maybe a perpetual isn't a step up. With that said, the wearability still is better on the 5140. And even though the 5140 has a slightly busy face I think I like it's appearance better as well.

QU
quattro
Jan 16, 2026

I wouldnโ€™t hesitate, especially as I like the micro rotor 240 caliber better than the central rotor one. And imo the 5140 fits your wrist better. But itโ€™s very subjective of course. Best, Emmanuel

YM
yming
Jan 16, 2026

.. I find the date ring to be disproportionately large.. and the fonts a mess eg the shrunken dates.. so I would stick to the 5960P

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →