Market
Panerai PAM00055 - Luminor Base Titanium case

Panerai Luminor PAM055

Titanium · brown dial Dial · 44mm

Ref: PAM055

SoldGBP 3,400

+ GBP 0 shipping

jamestemroot
Member since Apr 2008 · 18 yrs
83 Posts
21 Sold
1 Active
Singapore flag Singapore
View all listings → Active Dec 27
Panerai PAM00055 - Luminor Base Titanium case HubMarket Prices · Auction Records · Forum Discussions
Explore Hub →
Brand
Panerai
Condition
GOOD
Series
Luminor Base
Box
N/A
Model
PAM00055 - Luminor Base Titanium case
Papers
N/A
Reference
PAM055
Year
N/A
Case Size
44mm
Case Material
titanium case
Dial Color
brown dial
Location
United Kingdom flagUnited Kingdom
Listed
Apr 11, 2010
Updated
Feb 20, 2010
SOLD — This item has been sold.
VISA AMEX DISC
Make Offer

Contact seller to arrange payment

Description

Sellers Comments:

Watch Condition:

Model:: PAM00055 - Luminor Base Titanium case
Case Material:: titanium case
Case Size:: 44mm
Dial Color:: brown dial

<img src=" 
">  

⌚ Watch Specifications

Case

Material
titanium case
Diameter
44mm

Dial & Strap

Dial
brown dial
Strap
strap

📖 About This Reference

The PAM055 represents Panerai's Luminor Base series executed in titanium construction. This 44mm reference distinguishes itself from steel variants through its lightweight titanium case material, offering an alternative composition within the Luminor Base collection. The watch features a 44mm titanium case paired with a brown dial. The titanium construction provides reduced weight compared to traditional steel cases while maintaining the characteristic proportions of the Luminor Base series. No movement specifications are provided for this reference. This reference appeals to collectors seeking Panerai's Luminor Base design in an alternative case material. The titanium construction and brown dial combination offers a specific aesthetic within the PAM range, attracting those who prefer lightweight materials and earth-toned dial colors over more common steel and black dial configurations.

Collector Discussions

PAM 2025: An ode to the Fiddy and a nod to friendships of old
The PAM 2025 watch is a modern take on the classic Fiddy style, with standout features like gold pencil hands and a gradient blue dial. While the open caseback may not be preferred, the watch holds sentimental value for the reviewer, evoking memories of past watch friends.
forum · Mr.Gatsby · 1753 views · 5M
Newfound interest in 44mm PAMs.
Renewed interest in 44mm Panerai watches, such as the 5218 and classic models like the 1759 and 1708, sparks curiosity. Panerai's iconic status endures, with collectors seeking smaller pieces while anticipating future releases.
forum · ArmisT · 3409 views · 5M
24 meets 25
Comparison of early series 24C and 25H. 25 offers tritium value. Impressive dial angle in 25.
forum · Arronax · 3422 views · 7M
Greetings fellow Paneristi…a question for the experts
Paneristi Jon L. seeks explanation for discrepancy in production numbers of Panerai A-series watches. Found Pam00002 A-series with case back reading A1107/1500, conflicting with reported 1000-piece production.
forum · JL1NY · 14737 views · 1Y
Bettarini Fever !!
Long wait for PAM 384 repair leads to interest in PAM 176 and PAM 00010 models without crown guard signage. Exploring Bettarini rabbit hole, seeking opinions on fit for small 6.5-inch wrist. Photos from chrono24.
forum · Lankysudanese · 9551 views · 1Y
44mm 47mm, at least for me.
Author shares 14-year-old 44mm Officine Panerai watch as preferred over 47mm due to simplicity.
forum · Jay (Eire) · 7026 views · 2Y

🛡️ Buyer Protection

⚠️ Payment Safety: Use PayPal Goods & Services for buyer protection with new sellers.

🔒 Verify: Request a timestamp photo with today's date and your username.

🤝 Meet Safely: For local deals, meet in a safe public place.

You May Also Like

Panerai
Panerai
Luminor PAM632
Stainless Steel · brown Dial · 44mm
USD 4,200
Panerai
Panerai
Luminor PAM009
Black Dial · 44mm
USD 8,500
Panerai
Panerai
Luminor PAM061
Titanium · Black Dial · 44mm
USD 5,750
Panerai
Panerai
Luminor 1950
Rose Gold
USD 15,995

💬 Questions & Comments

Sign in to ask questions or join the conversation
hooscar Feb 20, 2010
comment Is the picture correct?