erhm
162
As a follow up:
Older pieces tended to be smaller—much smaller—than some of today’s watches. A matter of aesthetics over which folks can (and do) argue. My taste tends towards calendar models and moon phases and complications all of which can be problematic when it comes to limited dial real estate. So, the other end of the question, when is a watch too small? Here, I would argue the perpetual calendar is difficult to decipher, never mind the Dataograph Perpetuals! The two that see the most wrist time is the Perpetual Tourbillon and the Terraluna (not shown).
Three Heavy Weights
There are many ways to judge a time piece. Style, movement, and finishing are the usual categories. Size & weight are factors, but for me, only as disqualifying ones. I actually prefer heavier metals and a bit of size—substance—to the haute horology ultra...
I love it too...
But it is a bear to set, so it is one of the few I keep on a winder.
All amazing and beautiful watches .
Two gorgeous ALS watches , i don’t mind bigger or heavy watches .
What a trio! And that UN is boss!!!
My largest are likely the Zeitwerk and Urwerk 202S. As far as a disqualifier—hmmm perhaps the color of the metal.
As a follow up:
Older pieces tended to be smaller—much smaller—than some of today’s watches. A matter of aesthetics over which folks can (and do) argue. My taste tends towards calendar models and moon phases and complications all of which can be problematic when it comes...
Ah, thanks for sharing these beauties, especially the ZW MR and the YG Langematik Perpetual on the bracelet!
I remember when you first posted about the ZW MR after you got it. A real treat!
