jvo
22
Between those two I say 15300
The size is the critical factor to my eye.
I agree.
By: foversta : November 12th, 2012-14:24
Taking into account the price of the 15400, the price gap between the 15400 and the 15202 becomes less important even if it really exists. But well, the 15202 really embodies the Genta spirit thanks to its slender side. I found the 15400 too bulky. Fx ...
Thanks but....
By: dannyjak : November 12th, 2012-14:28
The gap between the 15400 and newer 15202 is likely to be around the $5k mark right? An even larger gap if I compare that to a used 15300. I would more than likely use the difference to put away for another watch down the track. Unfortunately that is my r...
15300.
By: MichaelC : November 12th, 2012-14:36
Given your choices. I have owned this watch before and I loved it. It has wonderful proportions and dimensions on the wrist, and looks larger than 39mm. Unless you have a very small wrist, I don't think clasp comfort is an issue. My wrist is less than 7" ...
Nico is spot on
By: ianny : November 20th, 2012-12:22
The Extra Thin Royal Oak will be awesome if you can find one. Why compromise when you run the risk of regretting later on. My AD showed me the 15400 today. The size is a little awkward and in the words of my AD... 'NAHHHH". He has less than flattering thi...