anaroku
2061
I was interested in # 5800 but haven't bought it yet
My arms are a little thin, and in the case of Aqunaut, # 5065 fits better than # 5167. So I like # 5711 and was very interested in # 5800. I cut out the photo and wrapped it around my arm
This is the original photo. Looks very good
Aquanaut case (5167 & 5065)
However, when I wore the real thing at the store, I felt it was very small for some reason, unlike the case of Aquanaut. I think the dial design of Nautilus is also related. ♯5711 suits me better
What’s more, the # 5800, which was released in small numbers, is very expensive. I can't make a purchase
[Pics rotated (FabR (moderator)]
I was interested in # 5800 but haven't bought it yet
My arms are a little thin, and in the case of Aqunaut, # 5065 fits better than # 5167. So I like # 5711 and was very interested in # 5800. I cut out the photo and wrapped it around my arm This is the original photo. Looks very good Aquanaut case (5167 &am...
Hi Shun, thanks for a fun and interesting comparison -- both looking gorgeous in my view, and nothing wrong with a slightly larger size for a Nautilus, like you can have with the 5711 ;-)
And I do agree -- the current values of the 5800 are *insanely* high, so given that one of my rules is to never buy above MSRP, I'd probably pass on it too! ;-)) PS: I slightly adjusted and rotated the last two pics for everyone to view them better. Cheer...
An ingenious way to test out the size of a watch !
In a paper cut-out and in the metal, the 5800 seems smallish on your wrist. Perhaps if you really like 5800, you could trade your 5711 for the 5800 ?
5800 is a weird reference for me
It costs almost as much as a 3700 but is the same size exactly as the 3800 which does not have a sapphire case back and upgraded movement Is it worth paying the premium for the 5800 ( also many less were sold as it was made for 1 year only) hard to justif...
i'm colour blind so I cannot tell
Here is my attempt at photoshop - trying to green the dial ...