One being the 249, for me the other would among one of these 127, 217, 4B, 26K, or 233. Please take into consideration the price/value ratio also. I mean the 127 would be an obvious choice but at almost 2x the price of a 233 I am not so sure.
One being the 249, for me the other would among one of these 127, 217, 4B, 26K, or 233. Please take into consideration the price/value ratio also. I mean the 127 would be an obvious choice but at almost 2x the price of a 233 I am not so sure.
If you see value being the 'complication' incorporated or actual manufacturing cost associated, then it's obvious that among your choice it would be the 233, with the assumption that we're talking abt. 'current' value as opposed to list price when the pie...
"Bang for the Buck"! I left the 190 off my list because I would then have two Rads and no representation from Lums or 1950 cases. The T-dials, PVD's and Pre-V's prices have hit the roof and I am not sure if I would buy a Panerai as much more options becom...
Nice pair, my friend... And this weird photoshopped pic is a keeper, too! A Toolwatch beside a Tool Horological watch. Best of both worlds! Best. Nicolas
that there are many with this duo but also many who have them in safes and bought them as they were rising in secondary market price. There is still a steady trickle of LNIB 249s with all the stickers and protective plastic on coming up for sale. Happily ...