aroma
521
Just looking - no intention to buy.......
I've just come across this piece:
It is a ref 2699 Con but I can't find it on the Omega database - what do you think about the dial?
Apart from the second hand being too long, do you think the dial is original?
It certainly doesn't pass the MOY test and the 'M' in Chronometer doesn't have sloping sides.
Also shouldn't the 'OMEGA' be in a cast gold moulding?
I'm not intending to buy but I often view these offerings as a way of brushing up on my knowledge base.
Any comments are appreciated
Cheers
Andrew
I saw that auction...
By: gatorcpa : December 5th, 2011-09:00
...and I think the watch is correct, but for the flaws you mentioned. Desmond did a write up on this particular model here: http://omega-constellation-collectors.blogspot.com/2008/07/cases-2699-and-2700-featured-very-first.html If you follow the link ther...
Arhh right..........
By: aroma : December 5th, 2011-10:43
So for the early Connies, the 'M's in Chronometer were not sloping and the 'OMEGA' is just printed (not cast) and the line through the MOY doesn't have to miss the Y entirely. I'll look at the watch again in a new light!! Great stuff - thanks guys. All th...
be careful
By: hoipolloi : December 5th, 2011-10:54
Hi Aroma I can see the "Constellation" on that dial is not correct (the t's are wrong style) it was printed in later style and the Omega logo has sharp edges instead of round edges . The A in OMEGA has a pointed top, my A has a flat top. I guess it was re...