Tick Talk[Moderator Emeritus]
2361
I don't believe its chronometer-rated
There is no mention in the official literature of a chronometer rating for any of the new Chronometrie Collection. Its a matter of semantics, chronometry vs chronometer, with the former referring to "the science of the precise measurement of time" according to the Societe Suisse de Chronometrie, while the latter is a trademarked performance standard of Controle Officiel Suisse des Chronometres.
I believe their philosophy was expressed by Monsieur Cabiddu when we visited the Villeret atiliers in 2013 and I asked why no chronometers. He replied through an interpreter that the movements were inherently superb timekeepers and it would be redundant to target the minimum COSC standards. This is why each Villeret watch at that time came with its own internal timing certificate. I absolutely agree with that point, however, there are traditional Observatory trials available, in particular the Concours International de Chronometrie, and a good placing there can only enhance their chronometric credentials.
Excellent write-up, by the way, Robin. I'm looking forward to your next installment. Further to this discussion, can you tell us if the 500 Hours QC program (80 hours of timing observations) are applied to the Chronometrie Collection, or something else? Is there a timing certificate and, if so, what does it look like? Thanks in advance