Review
Rovermark reviews the Panerai PAM 392 Luminor 1950 3 Days, comparing it to the PAM 312 and detailing its features, movement, and wearability.
34 replies48898 views
Looks great!
Is that a OEM 22mm JV or a 24mm squished into the lugs? I didn't think Panerai made a 22/20 JV :)
squished
unfortunately, it's a 24 squished into the 22mm lugs. It turned out a little better than expected, but i don't think i would have purchased the strap just to try it out.
Looks great
I wouldn't have known it was a squished 24mm strap just from looking at the pictures. Looks like a perfect fit IMO. Cheers, Anthony
Wrist size?
Beautiful watch!may i know your wrist size?i have a small wrist (6.3 inch) so pam 392 is one of my (logical) options for 1st pam..did you conisder pam 111 or 177?
re: wrist size
My wrist is about the same size. I did not consider the 111 as i prefer a brushed finish. I'm going to try on a 177 shortly, but did not initially consider it. The 392 was a very comfortable fit on my tiny wrists.