amanico
[JLC Moderator]
401340
+++1 Joe. And thanks, Raymond for these extra pictures and informations. [nt]
No message body
Basel 2017: The Seamaster / Speedmaster / Railmaster from 1957 are re edited.
Each of them are limited to 3557 pieces or... In a set, limited to 557 pieces. The Seamaster 300 1957 is two miliimeters smaller than the current Seamaster 300 ( 39 mm / 41 mm ). The Railmaster 300 1957 is 38 mm big, Like the original. The Speedmaster 195...
I'm getting my pitchfork out
Plexi crystal isn\'t on all three... I am now counting the seconds until the Railmaster is in my hands!
Well I should've been more specific.
We\'ll see, I need to hold it and make that decision. I sent an email instantly to the Sydney boutique though! So hopefully as soon as it\'s in I\'ll get to see it! I just asked \'to be on the waiting list\'.
Those are the stars of the show!
Omega did everything right with the Trilogy 1957 Amazing!!! Cheers Henrik
Am i the only one?
who starts to think that the industry is overdoing the re-release of vintage models? The execution is excellent, no doubt and they will sell out for sure, so cannot blame Omega at all. On the other hand, as a vintage watch lover, I have mixed feelings. Li...
No, you are not alone.
I had same mixed feelings, in some way I find it unfair for the owners of the originals, but as a possible new owner of the watch I like, I couldn't be happier. Have I said it already? Best. Vte
good way to look at it..and let's not forget the
totally crazy vintage prices. I am all for re-editions with modern movements.
Yes, that's another issue.
One of my biggest complaints about this "retro fever", is about crazy prices. I respect and understand it, but from my passion I find it unfair, probably because I can not afford them, but that's the way I feel it. In this material world we live in these ...
i am in two minds on it.....
....i actually like teh concept of owning both a modern and a vintage of teh same piece. At the same time, it does seem to be de rigeur across the industry to use this M.O. as it is so popular. On balance, I go with the trend. Further....take the original...
I think it is well done and those 3 are good ones
my only point was, that there are lately too many of those re-editions. I'd also like to see some modern innovation.
Agreed, its great to see what new tech can do in old toys but honestly I'd rather see a new toy worth plunking 7-10k on, the company is paying minimal in r and d and just adding a new movement/ goodies that should
Have been in the package already or should have made an appearance ages ago when they started the whole craze, but its that addige that companies will do whatever they can to sell you more watches and at least Omega finally listened to the masses. Althoug...
Only the Seamaster interests me.
The kit is obtainable but I'll pass. I do like the cleaner dial on the RM, but the Seamaster's bezel is just a thing of beauty.
i was just thinking that.....
......but i have the original SM300 with original bezel and insert....so that changes the equation for me...i am torn
You are fully set. Nothing here for you.
I tend to agree with Arie's opinion about re-editions. I have an easier time with how TAG handled the Autavia - yes, there are clear differences, and owners of the originals will not have interest. But their pieces are also not directly copied. So I prefe...
See I am also torn between the two
I do wish they updated the RM just a little with a screw down crown, especially since it\'s an automatic. I understand that perhaps this was not possible because of the size of the crown. I also want a plexi Speedy Pro... I still haven\'t got one. Perhaps...
I am stunned. Each one beautiful and so well executed..........a trilogy!
What a fantastic job from Omega. Housing a manual movement in the Speedmaster, reducing its size, my hat off, "chapeau", long live common sense Stylish and ...........real smart
I'm not into re-editions at all and find it mostly a sign of lack of imagination.
Having said that; I think I want this set
The trio is a superb attempt from Omega to cater to ordinary collectors
You could deliberate over whether vintage re-editions are \'unfair\' etc etc, but hey, for the vast majority of passionate collectors, what better way to acquire something that they could comfortably enjoy wearing every day! On the other hand, if one pref...
That being said I applaud Omega for their decision to use smaller case sizes for these reissues. Really, I like everything about these watches except for that fakey-patina stuff.
And, again, on this it seems I'm in the minority. So be it.
See I don't see it that way
I don\'t think it looks \'old\'. The tritium lime watches look old, but they also look cool. So therefore, if we can make new Lume look a similar colour and it looks cool. Then let\'s make the watch with those tones. To me, it makes sense. They could\'ve ...
I agree in almost all cases
But, as with many things in life, I feel that there are exceptions.
Don't get me wrong; I would applaud it if they gave the lume the same color as in '57
What color was it?? White-ish?
I'm guessing the lume was white-ish, yes... but no matter the tone it was in all likelyhood the best lume that was available at the time.
I don't mind a modern movement, but for whatever reason a dial with faux patina is somehow disingenuous.
No argument there!
But I\'m sure Rolex knows what they are doing as they have made few mistakes in their collection-line up-history. I think we should not forget that here on PuristSPro the taste in watches and the knowledge of them is extremely sophisticated compared to th...
Perhaps it's some sort of cunning plot
Does anyone else imagine Rolex controlled by a cackling puppet master?
Yes, but these Omega are limited release and small enough number to sell out.
The masses would likely not buy these watches as they are too small and look old! Rolex catered to the masses with the SD and not to people on this or other watch enthusiast forum.
maybe first Omega I like, depend of the price tag I think I could go for the Railmaster
how the Omega bracelet fit?
I'm definitely in for the Railmaster and the Speedy
Notice the watches in the Trilogy box set have extra writing on the dial (1957-2017 I believe) and some extra engraving on the caseback. For me I don't want a date range printed on the dial so I'm buying mine separately. My favorite watch this year is def...
really...i havent seen that writing on the dial? [nt]
can't see it on their website either
you may be correct....
......not sure how i feel about itr....the trio set need to be differentiated somehow......the date, if subtle could be quite cool.
Here's what Hodinkee says about the box set versions
"Note that it will also be possible to purchase a set with the three watches together, again in a limited edition of 557 examples, and Omega announced that those will bear dedicated engravings on the caseback and an extra script on the dial . The set will...
It's not that bad...see photos. It's good to distinguish from the other individual ones.
Small "Trilogy" and LE number ...
Yep....i have seen it now. I think we can get hung up on the minuitiae.....
......L.E or plain vanilla, these are all great and fund watches........if it was THAT important to be exactly like the original vintage, I would say GET the original vintage. But for a modern iteration.....these are ALL winners.
Load More Comments >>