Omega Military Chronograph ref. 2451
I'm new on the forum, but I already picked up some highly valuable Information from here previously, for which I'm very thankful. Especially because the watch I want to show is an Omega ref.2451 for military use, which was not easy to find Information abo...
Thank you very much Witti
Really impressive and complete topic. Even if I do not like military watches, thank you for teaching me in this particularly field. Best wishes Alkiro
Superb first post. First of all, welcome here.
As for your question, I would not change anything on these 2 watches. It is part of their history. With their flaws and their qualities. Both have great dials, I must say. Enjoy, Nicolas
Thank you
This was very interesting combination of history and your family story. Thanks for sharing!
What an excellent first post! Bravo!
Welcome and thanks for sharing this wonderful story with us! I look forward to seeing adn reading more about your watches! HAGWE S
It takes a lot to astonish me . . .
. . . but you managed to do so in grand style. And you were always a purist at heart - the history described in your post is all the evidence needed. A suggestion: try changing the chrono seconds hand alone at first. You'll then have a completely correct ...
Welcome and thank you for sharing your story!
If it was me, I would keep the watches as is. Possible source a correct seconds hand, but that's it! Best Blomman
Here is my CK2451, delivered on February 4, 1949 to Argentina
It has a black, glossy dial and the individual army number 463. Impressive to see the fading of the dial of your watch over time....!! Cheers, HSTE ...