WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

"Limited Edition" is a Meaningless Term

 

As an attorney who represents many reputable and well-known clients in the art world, I must tell you that at least in the United States the term "limited edition" is essentially meaningless.  I had the unfortunate experience of representing an art collector who purchased many expensive works of a famous artist, who denominated these works as "limited editions".  The artist later decided, however, to make additional prints of these so-called "limited editions", infuriating my client, who had paid a premium for what he believed would be works limited in number.  A federal court ruled against my client, holding that a "limited edition" simply means an edition of works limited at the point in time in which they were created; in theory, one could produce a second limited edition of the same work the very next day.


I believe that this concept applies not just to art but to all manner of goods denominated as part of a "limited edition".  While ethical manufacturers--and I will assume that Patek falls in this category--honor the spirit of the term and do not create more than the number in a particular edition, they are not legally bound to do so.  In short, I wouldn't put much stock in anything that claims to be part of a "limited edition".

  login to reply