Park 88
15
Yes and no?!
Given how much you spent on your 27, I can see why you are a bit upset by this. However, given how different the fundamentals of the watches are, I think you can take comfort in the fact that the similarities are only skin deep. I would take the 27 any day over the 35...I think the 27 is a prettier watch besides the amazing technical feats...and i am not a salesman!
I do agree with you also in that the tourbillion movement is no longer so special and exclusive as it once was. I would personally love to see RM do more complications besides tourbillion which seems to be the RM specialty complication (besides the split second of course!).
I don't suppose a Richard Mille annual calendar or Perpetual could be in the works?!
Not happy about new Nadal...
By: tom3 : April 1st, 2011-14:17
Owning a 27 as I do, I have to say that I'm not overly impressed with the introduction of their new offering at a fraction of the price. Whilst it will be heavier due to the glass / case material etc, the all important movement is only a gram heavier?!! H...
U guys sound like....
By: tom3 : April 2nd, 2011-14:32
Salesmen! Come on, be honest. Do you think RM would have sold the 27 through if everyone knew of the 35 waiting in the wings? No, they wouldn't. However, being the horological snob I am, I would have still wanted the 27 but I am slightly perverse or spoil...
Yes and no?!
By: Park 88 : April 3rd, 2011-07:37
Given how much you spent on your 27, I can see why you are a bit upset by this. However, given how different the fundamentals of the watches are, I think you can take comfort in the fact that the similarities are only skin deep. I would take the 27 any da...
Ok I will....
By: tom3 : April 3rd, 2011-13:18
Is it wrong that just because I am able to afford one that I should express a reservation with it's ownership? If not, why so chippy? I'm sorry you aren't able to have one in your stable but that's not really my affair so please don't chastise me for not ...
Are you dyslexic?
By: tom3 : April 3rd, 2011-14:49
If not, perhaps a bit slow but either way you should take the time to reread my posts again and maybe come back in........6 months maybe?! Then you will understand that they are the posts of someone that does not care what others think but only what is im...
Yawn..Yawn...
By: Andy : April 3rd, 2011-23:37
Nobody else in this thread has been rude or offensive except you...what does that tell you..? Look up the new Bubba Watson - it's the same as the Nadal but white - the RM012 is completely different...I guess you don't know what your talking about after al...
Wot? No ones been offensive?...
By: tom3 : April 4th, 2011-00:47
You think that by acting like a school teacher while making negative suggestions as to the makeup of peoples character, rounding it all off by some paragraph or sentence of candy coating isn't? Hahaha. Don't make me laugh 'Andy'. At least I've got the bal...
Hmmmmm...
By: tom3 : April 4th, 2011-04:33
Whilst I agree with you that light weight tourbillon are what raised peoples heads enough to look at his new brand ( of which for me the 9 and 27 are the ultimate) however, turnover and commerciality has to be his main objective surely? After all, RM isn'...
Interesting views...
By: chris4 : April 4th, 2011-08:07
Having held & inspected the RM27 I really struggle to see what you are concerned about with this 35. The 27 is miles above and beyond the 35, It always was a huge amount of money for a watch, there is only 50 or however many they ended up making. Just rea...
I agree with your point and.....
By: CL : April 4th, 2011-16:39
I totally understand what you are feeling. Though I can't say I'm not happy with the release of the RM35, I can safely say I feel your agony. The best situation is for you to be able to trade your RM27 to a RM009 and then buy a RM35. I can't afford a RM27...