cayenne1200
656
...but the 1019 is much more comfortable in the wrist. The 1665 however is kind of a constant disturbance on the wrist if it's worn loose. If it's worn tightly it's better but still not comfortable. 1019 rules! [nt]
No message body
Rolex Milgauss 1019
I have reviewed the Milgauss before. It was never a popular watch for Rolex. It was never seen as a "Rolex" when it was first sold. It doesn't have that Rolex DNA that is so overt from the Submariner class. It doesn't have that typical feel of a Rolex.......
Something very special, quite eclectic in its unobtrusive, almost modest appeal.. For me a piece for the connoiseurs.. I really can..
.. relate to your pleasure, having it in your stables and looking down, on a maybe low-key treasure, which to me is also a piece for the second look & love .. I liked your expression :" A slow burner watch".. - How true.. Thx for this share, which makes m...
a classy and understated Rolex. [nt]
but you are right, it is one of those 'kiv' ones.
This sums up how I feel about the red GMT hand Explorer II, it was always something to add in the collection but never got down to it. Then one day the perfect piece arrive and can't get it
off my wrist now, it is glued on lol The "Black Sheep" so to speak of Rolex s family always stand out. I hope I can add as beautiful a Milgaus as yours one day
This is one of my favourite watches of all time
I love watches with antimagnetic shielding, and the 1019 is easily the most beautiful, just the right size too. Enjoy!
It's in stunning condition looking at that photograph
Love it! I would gladly exchange my modern Milgauss for an oldie just like that.
The most beautiful reference IMO
I could easily do a two-watch collection with a black and a silver 1019. I sold mine because of offers I really could not refuse, but to me they are the best design Rolex has ever made. ...
Re:
Yes, I sold both pieces to the same person. I loved the 1019s more than the 1665 and 6263.