scotthicks61
63
This pic brings out the finish much better
Sometimes the lighting has an effect on steel and it's finish. Your earlier pics had me really looking at the crown and finish luster. This pic has less subdued lighting and I see nothing wrong with the watch. A better look at the bracelet markings would tell the rest from the outside. Do make sure and authenticate the movement and serial numbers. I'm still suprised you didn't get all the paperwork since this watch is pretty darn new. Even still, I would check it out. Post pics of the inside and that would put it to rest.
Thanks
Scott
304 or 316???
By: rick2 : July 24th, 2009-17:03
This watch looks good in the pics. The hands seem the right length. I don't understand the question of 304 or 316 steel. This is not a vintage watch and should be made of 904L steel. Until you see the guts (mvt), it could be a clone.
It is the Picture......
By: aboen : July 25th, 2009-16:49
when close to the watch with my camera it reduces the magnification, below is another shot from further away. By the way i decided to go ahead with the trade but I am still going to take Y'all advice and take it to a AD and open up the case. Much apprecia...
Gen
By: youp : July 27th, 2009-22:36
The SEL's are perfectly shaped The saphire is good, the magnification is the new rolex type The bezel is ceramic and correct The rolexrolexrolex engraving is correctly positioned If you buy and get that watch you'll be fine imho