Pulls from some of the greats, like the early 1980’s IWCs, but the overall package feels original, due to the chronograph and dial. Design is pleasing to the eyes while remaining a bit challenging.
High quality, from the inside out too.
The use of an Agenhor movement, with thoughtful modifications, pulls it over the top. In the long run, it is healthy to have third party suppliers for mid and high grade movements, especially chronographs. With an in-house movement, this is a $60,000(?) watch.
Good for Agenhor too, the Singer and Faberge were too much chronograph and too little watch. The Moser feels more balanced in terms of what I want.
Love the lack of screw down pushers. Makes it lefty friendly. I wear my watch on my off hand wrist, which is my right.
Moser is a young brand, totally ok to go outside the DNA of the design is strong. Look forward to seeing the rest of the line.
The design of the Signer Track1 best reproduces the concept of this chronograph movement.
By: Dmitriy : January 10th, 2020-15:14
ps.
The trend towards high prices for sports steel wristwatches is frightening and frustrating. And also not elegant design. Have designers run out of ideas elegant sports watches (as an example, Ebel Sport Classic)?
They’re a gutsy company, not afraid to go their own way. I’m not sure I love this piece but I admire the overall package. And the movement is outstanding.
I am a big Moser fan and I think they did a fantastic job with this chronograph. And also with the bracelet. Technically spoken.
I can very well live with this case but definitely not with the dial. The “60” looks ... weird... to me.
Perhaps it is just a “wrong” impression from the first pics and I have to see it in real. But now, for the moment, the whole product doesn’t sing to me.