Comments:
the sm300 was and still is a superb watch whichever model you go for as they have their own desirable differences. i did find the ploprof to beca bit heavy for leisure wear.
great history lesson for those that arent aware of the evolution. love the ads as well, i have mine carefully packaged in plastic sleeves.
after 20 plus years of collecting Omegas, the only thing i've never discovered is why they called s 200m wr watch a 300?
best
G
<< Previous Comments
Très cool, Jeff. The SM300 . . .
. . . of the mid-'60s is one of the best - if not the best - redesigns of all time. Personally, I'd take it over a CK2913. Sacrilege!
It's a cruel paradox: I love dive watches, but curiously, have little desire to own one (same is true of chronographs). Two Seamasters in my collection, but neither are divers.
Maybe one day . . .
Maybe you will come to it...
...concerning the SM300, I agree that the 165024 has a very powerful design
great post Jeff. i've had all three but never at the same time.
the sm300 was and still is a superb watch whichever model you go for as they have their own desirable differences. i did find the ploprof to beca bit heavy for leisure wear.
great history lesson for those that arent aware of the evolution. love the ads as well, i have mine carefully packaged in plastic sleeves.
after 20 plus years of collecting Omegas, the only thing i've never discovered is why they called s 200m wr watch a 300?
best
G