Chopard L.U.C XPS Prussian Blue Review

amanico · 2026-04-23T07:07:52Z

Explore the Chopard L.U.C XPS Prussian Blue from Watches and Wonders 2026. Detailed review, comparison with L.U.C 1860, and collector insights on design, movement, and value.

amanico

WPS member · Chopard forum

12 replies540 views3 photos

Nicolas (amanico) offers a compelling first look at the Chopard L.U.C XPS Prussian Blue, a standout from Watches and Wonders 2026. His detailed comparison with the L.U.C 1860 highlights key design and value propositions, making a strong case for why this ultra-thin dress watch deserves serious consideration from collectors. Nicolas's insights provide a valuable perspective on Chopard's evolving L.U.C collection.

12 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

In 2024, Chopard issued the green version of this watch. 2 years after, the LUC XPS comes with an uber cool Prussian Blue dial, and I must say that this is my favorite from the brand, and one of my favorite from this year, at Watches and Wonders.

I couldn't take photos, as I missed some time to do so, but here are official pictures.

This watch is 40 mm big, and remarkably thin with only 7, 2 mm. Ok, at 38 mm it would be perfect, especially for a 27 mm movement, which seems a bit lost in this case. But, other than that, it is close to perfection.

The case does not lack elegance, the dial is, in this color, a kind of dark blue, eye catching, and to tell you all, I am mad about these hands, much more than the Dauphine hands you have on the LUC 1860 also issued with a blue dial, this year. As for the dial it is made of brass, while the LUC 1860 dial is made of white gold. From the location of the small seconds subdial, you feel that the case is too big for the movement.

LUC XPS:

LUC 1860:

As for the movement, it is small ( 27,2 mm big, 7, 2 mm high as said above ), automatic, with a delicious micro rotor, very nicely finished with all the traditional codes of " fine horology ", such as the Cotes de Genève, perlage and anglages, and it is COSC Certified, with a stop second. The only difference I see with the movement of the LUC 1860 is that it doesn't have the Poinçon de Genève Seal.Both have a 65 hours autonomy.

LUC XPS movement:

So, if I had to make a choice between this LUC XPS and the LUC 1860, it would be the LUC XPS for me: I prefer its dial, its hands, the movement is not a big deal for me, even if I like the Poinçon de Genève a lot, I would have preferred a 2mm smaller case, for sure, but at 12 900 Euros, versus the 28, 200 Euros of the LUC 1860, there is no doubt. I know where my winner is.

Best,

Nicolas

About the Chopard L.U.C Ref. L.U.C1860

The L.U.C 1860 reference is a notable offering within the L.U.C collection, distinguished by its focus on classical watchmaking principles and refined aesthetics. This particular model, introduced at Watches and Wonders 2023, represents a continuation of Chopard's commitment to high horology, emphasizing traditional craftsmanship and a discreet presentation. It is recognized for its balanced proportions and the integration of a finely finished movement, reflecting the brand's in-house manufacturing capabilities.

This reference features a case crafted from Lucent Steel, a proprietary alloy, measuring 36.5 mm in diameter. The watch is powered by the L.U.C 96.01-L automatic movement, which is visible through a sapphire crystal case back. This movement is equipped with a micro-rotor and offers a power reserve of approximately 65 hours. The dial is presented in a salmon color, complemented by a sapphire crystal on the front.

Appealing to collectors who value understated design and mechanical integrity, the L.U.C 1860 fits into the brand's lineup as a dress watch with significant horological merit. Its limited production and specific material choices contribute to its appeal among enthusiasts seeking a watch that combines traditional watchmaking with contemporary material science. The model is a testament to Chopard's ongoing development in its L.U.C range.

Specifications

Caliber: L.U.C 96.01-L

Case: Lucent Steel

Diameter: 36.5mm

Dial: Salmon

Water Resist.: 30m

Crystal: Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

The 40mm case of the L.U.C XPS, while thin, can wear a bit large, a factor that might sway those who prefer more classic sizing, especially for a dress watch.
Despite the L.U.C 1860's classic design appeal, its significantly higher price point makes the L.U.C XPS a more reasonable and attractive choice for many collectors.
The sector dial design of the L.U.C XPS helps the small seconds subdial integrate more organically, enhancing its aesthetic appeal on the wrist.
The L.U.C XPS is recognized as one of the best values in high horology, offering significant quality and design for its price point.

The Discussion

quattro

Apr 23, 2026

I completely understand your preference, especially given the huge difference in price. The 40 mm case wears a bit large, though, from what I’ve experienced with the green dial variant. And because I’m more into classic design, I would personally pick the 1860. But at more than double the price it’s clearly not a reasonable choice… Best, Emmanuel

orahu

Apr 23, 2026

I am in an Uber and I can’t confirm this, but I presume the 1860 case is more like 38 mm?

jlux

Apr 23, 2026

Being the owner of the Forest green dial version I do share all of your comments. It is beautiful on the wrist and,due to the sector dial,the small seconds seems to integrate more "organically "than with other LUC XPS watches. For me also one of the best high horology values out there!

MichaelC

Apr 23, 2026

It is the same reason I passed on the salmon AE XPS. The sub seconds looks way too high. I prefer it anchored at the perimeter. Nice dial, nonetheless. I would be the fool who spends double for the 1860.

Concord

Apr 23, 2026

but you are so right regarding hands

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Chopard forum with 12 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

About the Chopard L.U.C Ref. L.U.C1860

Specifications

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

More from this Forum