
Amanico presents a compelling comparison between white gold and platinum versions of two Patek Philippe icons: the Chronograph Ref. 5070 and the World Time Ref. 5110. This article delves into the aesthetic and material distinctions that define these references, exploring how dial variations and metal choices influence a collector's perception and desirability. Amanico, alongside fellow collector Joe, offers a unique perspective by comparing their respective white gold and platinum pairings.




The Patek Philippe Complications reference 5130, introduced in 2006, is a World Time watch that succeeded the popular reference 5110. This model maintained the distinctive World Time complication, allowing for simultaneous display of time in 24 different time zones. Its design evolved with a slightly larger case and updated dial aesthetics, distinguishing it from its predecessor while retaining the core functionality that defines Patek Philippe's travel timepieces. It was produced until 2017.
The watch features an 18k rose gold case measuring 39.5mm in diameter and 9.8mm in thickness, housing the self-winding Caliber 240 HU movement. This ultra-thin movement, visible through a sapphire crystal case back, provides a power reserve of 48 hours. The dial is silver or opaline with a guilloché center, protected by a sapphire crystal. Water resistance is rated at 30 meters.
Reference 5130 appeals to collectors seeking a sophisticated travel complication from Patek Philippe. Its larger case size compared to the 5110 offered a more contemporary presence on the wrist, while its classic World Time mechanism remained a hallmark of the brand's technical prowess. The model was available in various precious metals, with the rose gold variant offering a warm aesthetic.
Wow, the 5070 next to the Montblanc shows how big the MB really it!
My honest opinions is one that I think you know. In 5070s, I think the P has something special. It has that factor X. The 5070G, though, is also a watch that I have owned! And its is a spectacular watch. I know you think that there are very good competitors on manual chronos, but for me, the 5070 stands in limited company for many reasons. For a start, it was some time before PP decided to relaunch a manual chrono. Second, the proportions of the 5070 were, at the time of launch, very atypical fo
.......my issue is specifically on the 5110. The G has a greater clarity to it...the dial is more pure. Legibility is better. The white dial has a wonderful contrast. Overall the G is a more formal elegant watch. the 5110P is just simply much cooler.
In my case the number of watches went out from control at one stage. Then I started to reduce with a final result that the number started to grow back to the original. The only development was that the watches were even more expensive. I started again to downscale by getting rid of coloured gold. Then there was left steel, titanium WG and platinum. Somehow I like the feel of platinum a lot and I have decided that whenever there is or will be a platinum version available, I will go for that subje
Before Paris I was not sure whether the 5070 is worth all the hype an praise it has earned. However having seen the P and the G and having handled them I am totally convinced by both versions. The P has got the edge as it is big, big theatre and spectacular and a watch you can't give back easily once you had it in your hands. My only reservation is that it wears a little bit big on the wrist and here the G gains over the P again as it will fly easier under the radar, will be more discrete. With
....these are watches that need to be worn to appreciate. A similar revelation occurred for me with 5110P..... it has a coolness that surprised me. I tend to like watches that are not overtly dressy. The 5110G is quite dressy for me. I thought the 5110P would be even more so.... i was wrong.
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 53 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →