Patek Philippe 5070J Metal Versions Comparison
Reference Guide

Patek Philippe 5070J Metal Versions Comparison

By amanico · May 15, 2021 · 75 replies
amanico
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
75 replies18195 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Nicolas, known as amanico on WatchProSite, challenges his own preference for white metals by spotlighting the Patek Philippe Ref. 5070J. He explores how this yellow gold reference, with its distinctive black dial, evokes the vintage spirit of the Ref. 2512 chronograph. This article delves into the aesthetic appeal and collector sentiment surrounding the 5070J, often considered a less conventional choice among its siblings.

75 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
You know me, I am a white metal guy. So personally, I would hesitate between a white gold or a platinum version. 

BUT, sometimes, the case / dial combination is really eye catching. 

This is the case, I think, with the 5070J. 



The black dial yellow gold case is a clear reminder of the original chronograph, the Ref 2512, 




bringing a touch of retro, clearly. And also, maybe, of coolness. 

Would I trade my 5070G for the J? No, not at that point, but the 5070 doesn't lack charm!

Best,

Nicolas

About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5070

The Patek Philippe reference 5070, part of the Complications collection, marked a significant return for the brand to large-format chronographs. Introduced in 1998, it was the first non-perpetual calendar chronograph produced by Patek Philippe since the reference 1463, which ceased production in the early 1960s. Its design drew inspiration from a unique Patek Philippe aviator's watch from the 1940s, characterized by its prominent case and dial layout, yet reinterpreted for a contemporary audience. This reference established a new aesthetic direction for the brand's chronographs, moving towards more substantial case dimensions.

The watch features a 42mm case, initially offered in 18k yellow gold, housing the manual-winding Caliber CH 27-70. This movement, based on a Nouvelle Lémania ébauche, was extensively finished and modified by Patek Philippe, meeting the brand's stringent quality standards. It provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours. The dial, in this specific configuration, is black, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The fixed bezel frames the dial, and the watch is typically fitted with a leather strap.

Reference 5070 appeals to collectors interested in modern Patek Philippe chronographs that combine traditional movement architecture with a more contemporary case size. Its limited production run and the subsequent introduction of variants in other precious metals contribute to its collectibility. The reference represents a distinct period in Patek Philippe's chronograph history, bridging vintage inspirations with a new era of larger watch designs.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal.CH 27-70
Case
18k yellow gold
Diameter
42mm
Dial
black
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
MI
Miles_151
May 15, 2021

Just a simple case of personal preference. You wouldn’t be you without your 5070g my friend. M.

FA
FabR
May 15, 2021

While my favorite of the series is probably your G, either way this is a pretty iconic reference that any collector should be happy to have regardless of color! ;-) Cheers.

GL
GLau
May 15, 2021

Each metal has a different feel. The J definitely has a vintage touch to it, and the combination of yellow gold with black dial provides a powerful 💪 look 👀 to me !

GE
Gelato Monster
May 15, 2021

this black J can only be beaten with Black R or salmon P. I suppose thats why they make 5170R 😊

SI
singingbee
May 15, 2021

Loves the old school charm of this 5070J.

CO
Costa (aka Connie)
May 15, 2021

I am a rose gold lover but this J really does it. It’s top-flight in the 5070. Beautiful photos.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 75 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →