
Small-luxury-world provides a comprehensive review of the Patek Philippe Ref. 5170, questioning whether it is a new classic or already established. His detailed analysis, accompanied by personal photographs, delves into the watch's aesthetics, wearability, and the nuances of its in-house CH 29-535 PS movement. This post offers a critical perspective on the 5170's initial reception and its place within Patek Philippe's chronograph lineage.




































) in white metal ...


The Patek Philippe Reference 130 is a significant chronograph model, notable for its classic design and the various configurations in which it was produced. While many examples feature a standard chronograph layout, specific iterations, such as those with split-seconds functionality, represent a higher echelon of horological complexity within the reference. The model is recognized for its balanced proportions and the legibility of its dial, making it a favored choice among collectors seeking vintage Patek Philippe chronographs.
This particular example of the Reference 130 is distinguished by its yellow gold case, measuring 33mm in diameter. It houses a manual-winding movement, typical for chronographs of its era, and is fitted with a crystal, likely acrylic or sapphire depending on the specific production period and any subsequent servicing. The case construction and movement finishing adhere to Patek Philippe's high standards for precision and durability.
Collector interest in the Reference 130 is driven by its historical importance as an early chronograph from the brand and the rarity of certain dial and complication variations. The presence of unique characteristics, such as Breguet numerals, specific dial signatures, or the absence of a tachymeter scale, can significantly influence its appeal. The reference appeals to those who appreciate the foundational designs of Patek Philippe's chronograph lineage.
I am not convinced at all... The 2 subdials which are below the 3 and 9 o clock line, which, therefore, eat the minute indexes ring, the hands, the combo of colors ( that may change with the further versions, though ), the finish of the movement ( I much prefer the 5070, go figure why! ), the prifle of the case, the bezel.... All these details make me much prefer the 5070 to this 5170. For me, the 5070 has much more soul, at least. Very nice post, actually! Best, Nicolas
and really breath taking pictures. I thought it was a quick packshot but it is fantastic. I think, as I mentionned in my post some weeks ago, that we arrive to the same assessment: a great Patek Chronograph, so elegant, classic and desirable. Funny how I also have a little problem with Patek deployant buckle's round Calatrava clasp. Thanks for the beautiful picture that I'll carefully keep on my HD :p Cheers, Mark
... I've read. I was about to sleep, now gonna need some pills :) Just a little comment about the pushers, because for me too, its critical. When you trigger the chrono, the pusher goes from soft to harder untill you reach the breaking point. The magic is in the smooth feel of the whole process. Why? This is what tells you the most about the royal movement. The reset is the most magical reset of all chrono's i've ever tried. The way the teeth of the wheel are designed, you got the sweet linear s
a classic ... at least for me and now let the roasting begin.... I like it more than 5070 ;) Do I smell burned meat :) Thank you very much for great post and awesome pictures Damjan
Thanks for this post and your beautiful pics ! But my opinion is that this chronograph can't be a reference. An example : the subdials are covering the minutes ring ! I don't like that at all...For me, it is just some kind of mistake (imho of course). I don't prefer the 5070 for a totally subjective reason : I find the bezel much too large and massive. For chronograph, my heart goes to Lange (Dato and even more the "simple" 1815) where calibers are just as beautiful as cathedrals (yes, I'm a lit
Great photos and great explanations! I used to dislike 5170 a lot, but you just described the feeling and impression I had when I saw it in metal and tried it on. The watch is very understated yet very sophisticated. For me this is one of the best examples Patek offers. I am also an admirer of 5070. The movement, although Lemania based, is ways better constructed and finished than any similar ones from VC, Breguet, Roger Dubuis that I have examined. The case is a marvel of construction. I hate h
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 37 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →