Patek Philippe 5170J Chronograph Review
Review

Patek Philippe 5170J Chronograph Review

By Mark in Paris · Nov 1, 2012 · 38 replies
Mark in Paris
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
38 replies12776 views7 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Mark in Paris shares his detailed impressions of the Patek Philippe Ref. 5170J chronograph after experiencing it in person. Initially skeptical, Mark's hands-on encounter transformed his perception, leading him to appreciate its timeless design, exquisite dial finish, and refined movement. His review offers a valuable perspective on how a watch can evolve in a collector's esteem once seen beyond photographs.

Hi everyone,

I could see in the metal and try the 5170J and I just wanted to share a few pics and my thoughts.

First, when it was launched I though it was fade and was too old-looking.

Since, I could read about older patek chronographs and could have a look to them and learn from all the pictures we can have on forums, blogs etc ...

Recently, I was surprise to start understanding it (and as time goes by it also made me get used to it and accept it). Hence, I decided I had to go and have a look at it. If there is something I learned from watches it's that it's always worth seeing them in the metal, and I would add it's even a good advice before having the legitimacy to judge one.

I knew the movement wouldn't have been a problem of course, but the case and the dial's style (indexes and writings) would be harder to accept from what I saw on pics before.

I know this watch is competing hard in the heart of Patek fans against the 5070. As far as I'm concerned I like the 5070 but it is not real love either. I guess people who have been leaving with them have a completely different experience and relation with it. Much more than me.

Back to the visit, I must say I was really impressed and completly seduced.

The main issue as I said was the dial side and I remember perfectly the impression I had: the silvery sand finished dial is absoltulely marvelous. My strong benchmark was the 1815's sand blasted silver dial: when the light was shinning of the dial, colored glints appeared and it was an amazing sight.

Here I had the same impression (on the contrary to other Patek silvery dials I won't mention).

Secondly, the hands are really beautifully cut and finished. I was dreaded to see steep edges as if the hands had been cut but not rounded finished (hands I could see from very high end brands and that is unacceptable to me).

The dark grey finish of the chrono second and minute hands is perfect, especially with the yellow gold color.

And finally the font used for the writings matches up very well the overall style (even if I thought until then it was too old fashioned, too 20's 30's styled for me).

The case remains quite thin but one thing I would may be regret is its square shape, feeling increased with its thinness. It maybe lacks of a smoother style here. This is something more obvious on the wristshots as I personnaly find it not perfectly integrated on the wrist. But this is really minor and the only issue I have here.

Concerning the movement, not much to say: perfect (whithout the minor bridge edges' finishing flaw of the 240 ... yeah I know, I'm a bit fussy when talking about finishing ...)

The pushers are one of the best: the start/stop has its little "tick" sound/feeling and a very smooth touch. Something I really enjoyed and was surprised about is the reset pusher's activation: no "thick", only a soft feeling and hop! back to zero. Really nice and it was the first time I noticed that from a chrono.

Very nice to see how the chrono wheel engages when the chrono is started. Very fine engineering.

Finally, the crown equipped with its dynamometric display: very soft and surprising too as when I gave a turn, the crown went backward from 1/4 of a turn.

To conclude, it was a marvelous and exciting experience. The watch finally is completly coherent and I understand it won't go out of fashion, it won't be influenced by its ageing and new models. In a word: "Timeless".

Here are some pictures ...

Cheers,

Mark
































  This message has been edited by Boréale on 2012-11-01 03:40:20

About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5070

The Patek Philippe reference 5070, part of the Complications collection, marked a significant return for the brand to large-format chronographs. Introduced in 1998, it was the first non-perpetual calendar chronograph produced by Patek Philippe since the reference 1463, which ceased production in the early 1960s. Its design drew inspiration from a unique Patek Philippe aviator's watch from the 1940s, characterized by its prominent case and dial layout, yet reinterpreted for a contemporary audience. This reference established a new aesthetic direction for the brand's chronographs, moving towards more substantial case dimensions.

The watch features a 42mm case, initially offered in 18k yellow gold, housing the manual-winding Caliber CH 27-70. This movement, based on a Nouvelle Lémania ébauche, was extensively finished and modified by Patek Philippe, meeting the brand's stringent quality standards. It provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours. The dial, in this specific configuration, is black, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The fixed bezel frames the dial, and the watch is typically fitted with a leather strap.

Reference 5070 appeals to collectors interested in modern Patek Philippe chronographs that combine traditional movement architecture with a more contemporary case size. Its limited production run and the subsequent introduction of variants in other precious metals contribute to its collectibility. The reference represents a distinct period in Patek Philippe's chronograph history, bridging vintage inspirations with a new era of larger watch designs.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal.CH 27-70
Case
18k yellow gold
Diameter
42mm
Dial
black
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Nov 1, 2012

As for the movement, I still don't know what to think, but the case, dial and hands on the 5170 don't convince me at all. The 2 subdials seem to be not centered, a bit lower than the " middle lane ". The hands are less refined than those of the 5070, as well as the case. But we are not obliged to have the same tastes, sometimes. ;) Thank you spo much for this excellent article, Mark. Best, Nicolas

DR
dr.kol
Nov 1, 2012

I like 5170 more and more and the movement is a real marvel. What I do not like are the Roman numbers on the dial. I have been tempted to get this watch but I have decided to wait till some white versions are coming to the market. Thank you for a great post! Best, Kari

BR
Bruno.M1
Nov 1, 2012

The 5070 gets my vote by far But that doesn't mean I don't like the 5170. In fact I love it. I saw it more than once irl and if it was not so expensive I would start saving. But today Patek watches became too expensive for me :-( But like Nicolas said, the case, dial, hands of the 5070 are imo better and I also don' t like these sunken subdials. But than again, I would be VERY happy if I could ever afford a 5170. Imo much better than the Dato, much better than the 5980 and much better than any c

ED
EDJA
Nov 1, 2012

I am speechless and can't stop watching the screen... Its amazing watch and which is most important its a everyday watch for any occasion

TO
Topcat30093
Nov 1, 2012

write your thoughts & observations regarding the 5170J. :) The photos were nicely taken. Now, the question is did you buy it? Regards Tony

GE
Georg
Nov 1, 2012

It is a great watch and mine gets quite a lot of "wrist time". Thanks for sharing those cool pictures! Best regards Georg

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 38 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →