Patek Philippe 5711 Nautilus vs. 5167 Aquanaut

Puffy · 2013-02-10T05:18:18Z

In-depth review and comparison of Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 and Aquanaut 5167. Discover design, comfort, and movement details.

Puffy

WPS member · Patek Philippe forum

10 replies11186 views0 photos

Puffy provides a detailed comparison and review of two highly sought-after Patek Philippe sports watches: the Nautilus Ref. 5711 and the Aquanaut Ref. 5167. His post, complete with illustrative photographs, highlights the nuances in design, comfort, and wearability between these iconic references, offering valuable insights for collectors considering either model.

10 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

I've bashed together a small write up and a few snaps to show the details and differences of the two references. I've also thrown in a Rolex to get out the details and dimensions..

In a nutshell the 5711 Nautilus is a classic among classics and the fact that you can't find it at ADs is an indication.

The 5167 Aquanaut must be one of the most comfortable watches to wear. The rubber strap is extremely comfortable.

Both are great sport watches, elegant and understated. Very interesting and small pieces of art and you can't go wrong with either.

Both 40mm and use the same 324 non-hacking movement

The 5167 has a big tasty roman numerals dial. by far the best lume of any watch I've ever owned

The 5711's blue dial needs little introduction, it's simply stunning

Three 40mm sports watches next to each other

The 5711 is very thin and sits very flat on the wrist. next to a £1 coin

Bit thicker is the 5167 and like the 5711 is hugs the wrist and it's pure bliss

5711 compared to a 1680 Sub

Both watches come with a clear caseback so the movement can be enjoyed

Deployment buckle on both - very sturdy and very high quality as it can be expected

5711 on the wrist. 40mm just the right size

This has to be one of the best crafted bracelets on the market. note the 1.5 link I've fitted to get a super comfy fit

5167

So comfy it's unreal

Another 40mm classic

On the arm to get an idea of the size of these two great Pateks

That's it folks, thanks for looking!

About the Patek Philippe Aquanaut Ref. 5167

Patek Philippe Aquanaut Reference 5167

The Reference 5167 represents the 40mm stainless steel iteration within Patek Philippe's Aquanaut model line. Introduced in 2007 and remaining in current production, this reference features a black dial and establishes the standard sizing for the steel Aquanaut offering.

The 40mm stainless steel case houses the automatic Caliber 324 S C movement, providing 45 hours of power reserve. The watch incorporates a sapphire crystal and smooth bezel configuration. Water resistance extends to 120 meters, while the distinctive composite rubber strap displays an embossed check pattern that complements the case design.

This reference appeals to collectors seeking contemporary Patek Philippe sports watch execution in stainless steel. The 5167 offers entry into the Aquanaut model range while maintaining the manufacturing standards associated with the Geneva manufacture. Its ongoing production status ensures availability through authorized channels for both new collectors and those expanding existing collections.

Specifications

Caliber: 324 S C

Case: Stainless Steel

Diameter: 40 mm

Dial: Black

Water Resist.: 120m

Crystal: Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

For a more direct comparison, the bracelet version of the Patek Philippe 5167 Aquanaut should be considered, as it brings its feel closer to the 5711 Nautilus.
The 5711 Nautilus is widely regarded as one of the most refined and comfortable full stainless steel watches available, with its thin profile contributing to its excellent wrist presence.
The Patek Philippe 5167 Aquanaut is noted for its exceptional comfort, largely due to its rubber strap, and boasts superior lume compared to many other watches.
Both the 5167 and 5711 share the same 40mm case size and the non-hacking Caliber 324 movement, visible through a clear caseback.
The difference in thickness between the 5711 and 5167 is minimal, with the Nautilus's design making it feel slimmer than it actually is.
The Nautilus bracelet is praised for its exceptional craftsmanship, often enhanced by collectors using a 1.5 link for a perfect fit.

The Discussion

dr.kol

Feb 10, 2013

Thanks Puffy for a very nice post.

In order really to compare 5167 & 5711, one should take the bracelet version of 5167. Then it is much closer to 5711. I have in my Aquanaut both the bracelet and the rubber strap. It's nearly like having two different watches. I would not say that 5711 is much slimmer than 5167. Just the design of Nautilus makes it feel much slimmer. In reality the different is very small. I have both 3712 and 5711 plus the thicker version of Nautilus, the AC 5726A. In order to have a "full set", I should pr

small-luxury-world

Feb 10, 2013

Maybe those watches are well known ...

but I appreciated every picture and your thoughts. Thanks, thanks a lot! Oliver

timlua

Feb 10, 2013

tnx for the photo comparo. Puffy

Dje

Feb 10, 2013

Thanks! This 5711 still haunts me! nt

scurfa

Feb 10, 2013

Cracking post Puffy I have been wearing my 5711..

...more than any other watch I own, I nearly got the aquanaut even though I love them I think I made the right choice, your watches look great by the way.

mjnoumoff

Feb 10, 2013

nice collection

thank you for sharing!

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 10 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →

Patek Philippe 5711 Nautilus vs. 5167 Aquanaut

About the Patek Philippe Aquanaut Ref. 5167

Specifications

About the Patek Philippe Complications Ref. 5711

Specifications

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation

More from this Forum