Patek Philippe 5960/1A Black Dial Impressions
Collection

Patek Philippe 5960/1A Black Dial Impressions

By patekova · May 9, 2018 · 49 replies
patekova
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
49 replies12762 views2 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

Patekova shares his initial impressions of the Patek Philippe Ref. 5960/1A, a steel annual calendar chronograph that defied initial market expectations. His post delves into the watch's unique complications and the polarizing design of its integrated bracelet, inviting the community to weigh in on its appeal and versatility.

49 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →








If my memory serves me well, 5960 1/A has far more complications than any steel watch Patek has ever made in series (1518 in steel was not made in series). It is a self-winding, triple date (annual calendar), fly back chronograph with both a power reserve and day/night indicator made in a water resistant screw back case, Further it has a detachable (yes, despite claims by Patek to the contrary) bracelet that can, without too much difficulty, be detached by a watchmaker, or owner with some knowledge and courage. Since I do do not have those 2 traits I relied on a watchmaker.

I thought when the steel version was introduced in 2014 that there would be an extraordinarily high demand for it - both short and long term. The fact that it was steel, less expensive than the precious metal versions, round, highly complicated, IMHO very attractive, and that unlike all other 5960s had a bracelet, would only add to its allure. Yet, it did not become the huge hit I expected it to be. I love the steel version, both because of the practicality and beauty of steel and the beautiful dial (both the white and black versions).

My impression is that many people were (and are) turned off by the bracelet. At the beginning people assumed (because that was what Patek said) that the bracelet could not be removed. It is generally said that people either love or hate the bracelet. Clearly the bracelet is very comfortable and extremely well made. It just seems that aesthetically, either style wise (say compared to a Rolex Oyster bracelet) or just how it looks on this specific model, there are many naysayers.

I do not fall into either the love or hate camp. The bracelet has a lot going for it, but in some ways I think the bracelet overwhelms and diminishes the perceived beauty and complexity of the dial. Also for me, the lugs get a bit lost with the bracelet. But on the on other hand I very much appreciate the comfort and extremely high quality of the bracelet. Also with the bracelet on, for me the watch has an undeniable alternative appeal.

On balance, at least for now I opt for the strap, but not by an overwhelming margin. How do you guys/gals feel - bracelet or strap? How do you like 5960 1/A compared to the precious metal 5960s? Any preference, white or black dial?

Best, patekova





 

About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5960

The Patek Philippe Complications reference 5960A, introduced in stainless steel, represents a significant offering within the brand's annual calendar chronograph series. This particular reference is notable for being the first annual calendar chronograph from Patek Philippe to be offered in a non-precious metal, making it a distinctive piece in the Complications collection. It combines practical complications with a robust case material, appealing to collectors seeking a blend of utility and horological complexity.

This reference features a 40.5mm stainless steel case, housing the self-winding Caliber CH 28-520 QA 24H. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours and is visible through a sapphire crystal case back. The dial is presented in white, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The integrated stainless steel bracelet complements the case material, providing a cohesive aesthetic.

The 5960A in stainless steel holds a specific position for collectors due to its material choice and the integrated bracelet, differentiating it from its precious metal counterparts. Its combination of an annual calendar and chronograph functions, along with the 24-hour indication, makes it a highly functional and mechanically interesting timepiece. The special hand set and case back decoration mentioned for this specific 5960A further emphasize its unique attributes within the production run.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal.CH 28-520 QA 24H
Case
stainless steel
Diameter
40.5mm
Dial
white
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
TH
Thy1r
May 9, 2018

Beautiful picture and awes me watch. Mine is waiting for me at the salon I love my 5960/1a white dial a lot. And also thanks to the bracelet. So my POV is strict : bracelet bracelet bracelet cheers

AM
amanico
May 9, 2018

I am deeply convinced that the 5960A didn't have the success it deserves because Patek said the bracelet cannot be removed. Now, the big thing with the A versions is the dial. Young, fresh, dynamic, less formal than in the noble metals ( at the exception of the G which shares the same style than the A ). Horologically, it is a great watch, as you said, with an interesting combination of complications. As for the bracelet, I am in the naysayers camp. I really don't like its aesthetics, which I fi

GL
GLau
May 9, 2018

its advantages. Bracelet is more sporty and comfortable for the summer, whereas leather is more formal and stylish ! However, my comments only from your photos as I have yet seen them in the metal. Please keep us updated on your evolving thoughts ! Cheers, Gordon

FA
FabR
May 9, 2018

I was strongly in favor of its original bracelet at the start, and that still remains my preference, but I've been seeing many great strap versions over time that I don't mind that either now... The specific strap you put on your watch goes along wonderfully with its dial. And I'm willing to bet my dollar that this black version (by far my favorite, save the Leicester -011) will appreciate significantly over time... Best wishes.

CL
Clueless_Collector
May 9, 2018

I agree when this came out in the white dial, it doesn’t have the usual crazy demand of a “Stainless Steel” Patek watch and is surprised even after the discontinuation, interest is still lagging. However your black one is a different story since it’s only produced for a year so it’s a potential unicorn or dark horse. Personally I like it and would love to own one. I wonder nowadays how many buy watches for potential future or really “oh my, I really like this watch and have to get it and wear it

JO
Joepny
May 9, 2018

My fondness has really grown tremendously since becoming an owner. Of course we all do it with our own watches. But I will say the black ‘60A is like enjoying a fine concert/meal because it is worth the steep price of admission and stays with you long after. In terms of bracelet, I love its comfort and do not intend to remove it. I do like how it looks on a beautiful leather strap especially yours with the red stitiching. Perhaps one day in the future I will be tempted to order a strap. I would

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 49 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →