Collection
Clueless_Collector, a respected member of the WatchProSite community, shares a compelling comparison of two significant Patek Philippe Ref. 5960 models: the original platinum (P) and the final steel (A) versions. This article delves into the nuances that distinguish these references, offering insights into their design, functionality, and collector appeal. Clueless_Collector's personal experience and detailed imagery provide a unique perspective on owning both the genesis and the swansong of this important Patek Philippe complication.
The Patek Philippe Complications reference 5960A, introduced in stainless steel, represents a significant offering within the brand's annual calendar chronograph series. This particular reference is notable for being the first annual calendar chronograph from Patek Philippe to be offered in a non-precious metal, making it a distinctive piece in the Complications collection. It combines practical complications with a robust case material, appealing to collectors seeking a blend of utility and horological complexity.
This reference features a 40.5mm stainless steel case, housing the self-winding Caliber CH 28-520 QA 24H. The movement provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours and is visible through a sapphire crystal case back. The dial is presented in white, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The integrated stainless steel bracelet complements the case material, providing a cohesive aesthetic.
The 5960A in stainless steel holds a specific position for collectors due to its material choice and the integrated bracelet, differentiating it from its precious metal counterparts. Its combination of an annual calendar and chronograph functions, along with the 24-hour indication, makes it a highly functional and mechanically interesting timepiece. The special hand set and case back decoration mentioned for this specific 5960A further emphasize its unique attributes within the production run.
For me the patriarch of all PP variants of their self-winding chronos and triple date windows post 2006. So practical, useful, classical, and above all beautiful. I think you know what I would choose (when forced), but to be honest both are different and both uniquely wonderful!
Took me quite a few years to finally realize that dream. Totally agree this is a tough one to choose But luckily I don’t have to 🙏🏻
I still have that photo … now who’s the recidivist 😬?
for its sportier handset and the finishing of the calendar windows. There’s many more tiny differences but these two swing the balance in the A’s favour for me.
They are very creative and smart to create the product into so many variants and yet not boring at all. Kudos to them rather than some others with just color dial differences. I have to admit I reach for the A more often.
I could never decide which version to get. This is the right way to do it. Collect them all. Very nice!
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 46 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
