Patek Philippe November Wristwatch Review Winner
Community

Patek Philippe November Wristwatch Review Winner

By ImranLondon · Dec 9, 2017 · 19 replies
ImranLondon
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
19 replies3816 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 ✉ 🔗

Miranda presents the November Wristwatch Review, a community initiative aimed at building a comprehensive archive of Patek Philippe watch reviews. Esteemed collector Dr. Kol, also known as Kari, was invited to judge the submissions, ultimately selecting a Patek Philippe Ref. 3448 review as the winner.

19 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Dear All

I asked one of the most prolific Patek Philippe collectors I know, and someone who has an immense passion for the brand to judge, it was my pleasure to ask Dr.Kol aka Kari to pick the winner for November 

Here is his response 

NOVEMBER WRISTWATCH REVIEW:

No other internet based community could come with such a great idea than
the competition of wristwatch reviews of the watches of Patek Philippe.
With time we will get a great archive of reviews and I hope they will cover
at least most of the modern Patek Philippe watches.

If I understood correctly, the Mastermind of the Wristwatch Review Miranda
aka Imran asked me to judge the first four reviews and give my verdict.
This time I took the job quite seriously even I’m far away from home in
Singapore. I studied the four reviews carefully and thought all of them
with the help of around 10 bottles of Tiger beer.I thank Imran for the
great honour.

Here are my thoughts:

*Simcollector Ref. 5800:*

A nice and shortish review. My initial thoughts were that why I did not
work harder to get this reference. The review must be well done to wake me
up to think about that.

What was perhaps missing was a clear explanation what are the differences
between ref. 5800 and 5711. Clearly 5800 is a bit smaller but in my opinion
the main difference is the case construction. Ref. 5800 is loyal to the
case construction of the original 3700 where the case was constructed from
just two parts.

*Watch-guy.com 5975R:*

I found, as an owner of 5975P this review very interesting. I also enjoyed
all the pictures as well as the description how the reviewer really feel
about the watch. Furthermore, presenting the packing was a nice detail.

Why are the Moderators Moderators. Baron and Amanico posted two heavy
weight reviews.

*Amanico: 5070 in depth review:*

An absolutely stunnig review. This is among the very best ones I have never
studied. As an owner of 5070P I really appreciated it because the reviewer
understood the watch in question so much deeper than I never could.

Some highlight of the review were:

- Absolutely stunning photograps.
- Discussion about the technical details.
- All 4 versions were discussed.
- Comparison of 5070 with other prestigious chronograph.
- The review had a very personal touch and it was easy to understand that
the reviewer really loves “his” reference.

A super review!

*Baron 3448 the “wonder Watch”*

Again, the photos were fantastic. I also enjoyed the well written overlook
of the history of the reference. I had a good laugh when the reviewer
(nearly) wrote: “ Ringo Starr, Andy Warhol and Baron aka Joe owned ref.
3448”. I also enjoed the fact that the review was nicely detailed and the
author was so emotional about his watch.

As a negative comment I would like to mention that after freading the
review for the second time my brains started to repeat: “I need to get one,
I need to get one, I need to get one…”

*Verdict:*

Who could really compete with Amanico, the man of well over 150,000 posts.
But this time Baron is the winner because the review was written recently
while the review of Nico’s 5070 was about seven years old.

If the freshness of the review would not be a factor to consider, who could
really compete Amanico’s 5070 review. That is one of the classics.

Happy weekend to everybody and huge congrats to the winner(s)!

Best, Kari

So congratulations to the Baron!

Looking forward to December 

I hope more will take part, good luck!!

Best
Imran




About the Patek Philippe Ref. 5070

The Patek Philippe reference 5070, part of the Complications collection, marked a significant return for the brand to large-format chronographs. Introduced in 1998, it was the first non-perpetual calendar chronograph produced by Patek Philippe since the reference 1463, which ceased production in the early 1960s. Its design drew inspiration from a unique Patek Philippe aviator's watch from the 1940s, characterized by its prominent case and dial layout, yet reinterpreted for a contemporary audience. This reference established a new aesthetic direction for the brand's chronographs, moving towards more substantial case dimensions.

The watch features a 42mm case, initially offered in 18k yellow gold, housing the manual-winding Caliber CH 27-70. This movement, based on a Nouvelle Lémania ébauche, was extensively finished and modified by Patek Philippe, meeting the brand's stringent quality standards. It provides a power reserve of approximately 55 hours. The dial, in this specific configuration, is black, protected by a sapphire crystal, and the watch is water-resistant to 30 meters. The fixed bezel frames the dial, and the watch is typically fitted with a leather strap.

Reference 5070 appeals to collectors interested in modern Patek Philippe chronographs that combine traditional movement architecture with a more contemporary case size. Its limited production run and the subsequent introduction of variants in other precious metals contribute to its collectibility. The reference represents a distinct period in Patek Philippe's chronograph history, bridging vintage inspirations with a new era of larger watch designs.

Specifications

Caliber
Cal.CH 27-70
Case
18k yellow gold
Diameter
42mm
Dial
black
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Sapphire

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
BA
Baron - Mr Red
Dec 9, 2017

.... and still won! Ask Imran.... I voted for you. Many thanks Kari. Very honoured.

AR
Ares501 - Mr Green
Dec 9, 2017

Joe wins Why Joe always wins? Congrats and thanks for judging Kari Cheers D

GE
geross
Dec 9, 2017

Very well deserved. Keep posting. Cheers. Ill keep learning my friend. Geross.

MI
Mike H
Dec 9, 2017

But immense congrats to Joe for this wonderful review of the Wonder Watch. I agree with Kari: 3448 has a big drawback for anyone who encounters this Watch: it is totally fascinating, irressistible, and addictive. That your brain repeats continuously "I need to get one, I need to get one" is totally normal. Thank God I am on the safe side as I already fell in love and could not resist to the fatal attraction of the Wonder Watch because of the British Vlad / Navigator

BA
Baron - Mr Red
Dec 10, 2017

Yours was the ultimate review though.

SP
SpinnefrisstKuh
Dec 10, 2017

Thanks to Baron. That review made me want that watch. Never thought a gold watch would do that to me. Thank you very much.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 19 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →