foversta[PuristSPro Moderator]
20814
It is a relief for Lange: the watch is approved by the sharp analysis of the Count! ;-)
Sadly, I don't have the breakdown of the 390 parts of the movement, I will ask!
Best.
Fx
Great review FX!
By: Stylophile : January 30th, 2016-13:51
Very informative indeed; you are absolutely right; movement side should have been more exposed to reveal the mechanism; also I feel the dial lacks contrast, although I like the proportions; seems very balanced and emphasizes the stop second mechanism. Tha...
Thanks Mark!
By: foversta : January 31st, 2016-01:54
I understand your point about the end of power reserve indicator. But at the end, I like its presence. It is the only element which brings a rupture on the flat dial and it is also nice to have from time to time a red touch... even if you wind it daily, t...
Brilliant review as always
By: sanzaw : January 30th, 2016-19:55
Thanks for pointing out the mechanical harmony between the jumping seconds and constant force. This is the very few Langes where every single mechanical element coherently contributes to the one single goal of accurate time keeping. All that in an elegent...
Thanks davudvi!
By: foversta : February 1st, 2016-12:22
I think at the end it is a matter of taste. But I have to confess that applied elements usually enhance the perceived quality of a watch. At least, we can't miss the jumping second hand here, our eyes are not distracted by other details! Fx
In the first instance….
By: sc16 : January 31st, 2016-20:51
I was not impressed with the RL jumping seconds..JLC did this last year as well and did it in an ‘affordable’ watch which to me is more important. Having said that, what a great review and thank you for outlining why this is so special and I must say I un...