Don't you mean the 44mm? I don't think the 42 was ever shown, but I believe that one is coming out.
Regardless, they don't need to change their act at all. This is like people who complain athletes make too much money but still pay for tickets to the games. If the initial 75 buyers of the "limited edition" are so ruffled now, they should pass and not pu...
isnt that what arrogance sounds like my friend 'Do what they want and be fine'. I am simply talking about the fact the two new ROOs were in the offering lineup on the website for 1day and then they were pulled off.
Then all blogs that had written about them had to pull it down. Yeh do whatever.
I don't disagree. But AP has the ability to monitor reaction and act accordingly.
No penalty for them. Was the 42mm titanium originally on the website? I never saw it. I am told that one is coming out, but maybe the info changed again. We both know every year models come out that are not immediately, or ever, shown in the novelties sec...
Why does it matter...
If it's 75 pcs total, 75 a year or some other number? If you wanted the watch and reserved one then great for you, you got a beautiful AP. The only reason I could see that one might be upset is if they only bought the watch for investment purposes based o...
AFAIK Limited Ed has has never been APs strong suite nor anyone plays AP for investment but exclusivity yes. Regardless, the pt I was makin is their corp communication shud be as strong...
...as the brand value. Why and how did the new 42mm/44m ROOs disappear from web? I doubt any other product launch of similar value in any industry wud go unexplained after getting such a huge media coverage. but whatever!
Opportunism in pure state...
I am happy as I might be able to get one, but also sad to see that the brand is having such an erratic behavior. no even talking about their new line release. this summarizes it pretty well... ...
Ltd
Hi. I just called AP House Hong Kong but they insist it is a 75-piece ltd edition only. Not 75 pieces per year.
