WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Audemars Piguet

If your point is that there are many in the market who are just sheep and followers

 

or merely following the dollar signs, I agree without reservation or qualification.

My earlier post took issue with your statement (made again above) that RO prices "followed" "rocketed Nautilus" prices.

I would argue that Nautilus prices were soft for MANY DECADES before the RO prices started rising just before the 40th anniversary.

So the Nautilus followed the rise of the RO?

Either way I really don't care, just trying to get the historical facts correct.  You seem to have issues with the RO (and its role in AP history) yet seem to be okay with the same dynamics of Nautilus vis a vis its place in PP history and secondary pricing vis a vis "anniversary"...

On a purely personal level, I never really cared for the RO and slightly preferred the Nautilus until the late 1990's.

I now like both and depending on my mood, I may prefer the more angular and sharper RO or softer and more "rounded" Nautilus (Ferrari vs Lamborghini) but not much more than both brands more classical lines...

I've been watching and "collecting" since 1976; it's been an interesting unfolding "movie."

Cheers,

TM

  login to reply
💰1729 Marketplace Listings for Patek Philippe