219
3826
All good questions...
The answer to the first is that we (myself wth GF) are working on an article that will look at DT30 degree, the Quad, and then IP2. Hopefully sometime this year.
The answer to the second question is a follow-on: IP2 was longer in the testing phase than the others because of a number of changes to the movement itself. One half of the quad has been inverted and re-positioned so that the movement and the differential can be seen. Brilliant watch and once again, will try and get some live photos on the deck this evening.
Thanks
Andrew H
SIHH 2011: Greubel Forsey Invention Piece 2
Greubel Forsey Invention Piece 2 In ten years, no less than six significant inventions have sprung from Greubel Forsey's EWT think tank, three of which (to date) have been celebrated by Invention Pieces (IP). In 2007, IP1 paid homage to the Double Tourbil...
A Comment and 2 Questions
Thanks Andrew, I know that G&F have 'proven' i.e. tested the premise that more tourbillons give better performance 1 vs 2 vs 3 vs 4 tourbillons. Only because I know of the unpublished datasets (commercial sensitivity). 1) When will the data ever be publis...
All good questions...
The answer to the first is that we (myself wth GF) are working on an article that will look at DT30 degree, the Quad, and then IP2. Hopefully sometime this year. The answer to the second question is a follow-on: IP2 was longer in the testing phase than th...