MichaelC
[AP Moderator]
21937
For the first time, I have tried on a Freak
I know, why not before? I have seen them but actually do not even recall handling one. In any event, on a recent trip to Las Vegas, I came across this wonderful Freak Phantom, a 99 piece LE launched in 2013.
Impressions? It is awesome. So much depth to it. I was able to wind it and adjust the time. Both charming aspects of owning a Freak for owners I suspect.
I'm not sure the added tourbillon complication on this and other versions is really necessary, but it sure looks cool. Still, I would definitely opt for a more "conventional" Freak (if that makes any sense).
TracieC managed these shots while I had it on:
As I mentioned, it is a very deep piece. I could be eternally content with a Freak in my collection.
I had really hoped to see a Freak Cruiser but could not find one. That will likely be my Freak choice, hopefully one day...
For the first time, I have tried on a Freak
I know, why not before? I have seen them but actually do not even recall handling one. In any event, on a recent trip to Las Vegas, I came across this wonderful Freak Phantom, a 99 piece LE launched in 2013. Impressions? It is awesome. So much depth to it...
A Freak is a Freak, a milestone in a collection, in my biased opinion.
Now, if I had to get one, I would probably repeat my choice, and go for a first generation. I prefer the smaller case, and the lucky lack of lock ( that sounds quite funny, phoneticaly speaking ). But I wouldn't complain if I could get a Diavolo. So, soon...
I really like this limited version...
however, I agree with you. Love my original version 1.0 in WG at 42 mm. Unmodified and happy I never had some of the initial escapement problems. I must say I like it without the lock as well, but I think all versions are winners! To think mine is 13 year...
Hard to ever beat the original.
That will always be the best Freak, IMO, even if I would go for the newer Cruiser version. Thanks for the photo, Dave.
Had I been wise enough to get the original years ago...
I would not part with it either. While I have not yet handled a Cruiser version, I like the updates it has received. One day I hope to officially join the club :-)
That day will be a happy day, for sure, Michael.
You are so in love with that Watch that you deserve it. But wait a minute... You already own the 160. You dream of the Sonata, and you want a Freak... You will end exactly like me! :) Best, my friend. Nicolas.
Thank you my Friend.
I am happy to be in the 160 club with you; perhaps I can join the other UN sub groups one day :-)
Great version!
It is an amazing watch and design no matter whether it is the original version though to the latest cruiser. I love the new models with the use of the anchor and waves on the bezel. I actually had mine on last night after a break sat in the bank and remem...
I have told you before, that watch is my favorite of the ALVs.
The "Andrew Luff Versions", of course! Hope all is well your way Andrew.
Wow!! Such a beautiful piece!!
Is this a piece unique? I can’t tell what’s written on the bezel lock.
Thanks for the reply:)
Sorry if I was unclear, I was referring to the Mr. Luff version. Also, do you know if anyone here owns this watch? I’d love to get some real world insights. I saw a gentleman named Nick has one, but I’m not sure if he’s an active member here anymore ...
I absolutely love my Freak Blue Cruiser, but I might prefer the Phantom, or the Diavolo
The primary reason is that I really miss the precision of a seconds hand. The minute hand on the Blue Cruiser is quite wide so you never really know the time more accurately than +/- 2 minutes or so. Plus the tourbillon inside a tourbillon concept is supe...
