mac
206
Navigator Perpetual - why so little interest or commentary?
Well, I was looking at sportier watches, primarily divers and happened across a Navigator Perpetual. Of course it's not what I was actually looking for or even a particularly water friendly watch, but I do find it captivating. It's also interesting that when the original two models came out, I thought they were too big. Now, however, the size seems fine, especially when I am comparing it against the larger wearing BP Fifty Fathoms, or even the GO Sport Evo.
After doing numerous searches, there is little commentary on this model and few acknowledge owners. I guess it brings up the question of why so little interest. While price plays a factor, there are numerous other sporty watches in the same type of niche that seem to spark more curiosity. Given that, is it such an oddity of having a perpetual complication with a casual watch? Is it also too much of a contradiction of having a busy dial with a Pilot watch known for their simplicity? The IWC Big Pilot, however, is quite popular and it also strays for the simple norm. Overall, I think this may be one the least mentioned GOs. Any thoughts why?
In terms of the Navigator line, I really like this model in particular. The dial seems to easily absorb the perpetual features without breaking up the dial's symmetry. Unfortunately, I don't seem the same symmetry when I look at the other models. The short hour hand of the time-only model just doesn't look right to me, albeit it's probably the best value. Similarly, I don't like how the "4" is cutoff on the panodate version as well as the starkness of the white date background. While I find this model with all of its contradiction appealing, it makes wonder if I am better off not combining a Pilot genre watch with a perpetual. Have you considered the Navigator Pereptual at one point in time, but ultimately reconsiderd? Any thoughts on these models would be appreciated?
I did....
By: MiniCooper : June 14th, 2010-12:35
flirt with it briefly but decided against it..... I think that the complication does not suit a pilots watch.... Also the simplicity of the big date and the retro look of the base model are more attractive.... It seems though that GO does not manufacture ...
yes, considering it
By: mac : June 14th, 2010-13:15
I really like the style, aesthetics and the perpetual complication. I having doubts, however, about the combination. I associate perpetuals with dress watches and pilot watches are far removed from that. As a result, I wonder how well the design will age ...
One photo in my files . . .
By: Dr No : June 15th, 2010-23:35
. . . of the rose gold model, taken last year (sorry for the reflections). Funny that you mention the IWC Big Pilot perpetual; it seems considerably more complex, with a plethora of days, dates, and months printed on the dial. The Navigator is somewhat sm...
i've got one -
By: maikeru : June 15th, 2010-00:38
I believe there are two editions (at least) of this watch. I've got the limited edition RG one with the black dial from circa 2001 or 2002 (?). I'm not too keen on the recently released revision which, IMO, seems crowded and unbalanced. The one I've got, ...
Agree the older one is very nice
By: mac : June 16th, 2010-06:21
While I like the size and case style of the older version, I actually prefer the dial and hands of the new version. I like the use of the dark background (versus the white) in the date and other windows. I find it odd that GO doesn't use a black backgroun...
Thanks for bringing back . . .
By: Dr No : June 16th, 2010-10:17
. . . that blast from the past! I well remember revisiting that review many times. I had the opportunity to acquire one of the steel limited edition Navigator perpetuals when they were available from the dealer that commissioned them, but went for a rose ...
Perpetual
By: Le Chef : June 15th, 2010-06:50
I had always thought that as one of the great complications a perpetual should be a special occasion watch, but I've recently had a rethink. Surely this should be a complication you wear everyday? It's highly useful/practical from the point of view of the...