Dr No[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
37542
I share your thoughts to a degree, Sam . . .
. . . and acknowledge a personal preference for the first generation of perpetuals, especially the Karrees. The dial of the current Senator Navigator Perpetual takes advantage of additional dial area by allowing more free space around the apertures, which I find preferable aesthetically on an objective level; likewise, the use of consistently sized markers and the substantially larger year indicator absorb much of what would otherwise be empty space. On the other hand, I still find the earlier version to have a special charm . . . it's idiosyncrasies give it a touch of character. The current versions are more elegantly poised, but who's more compelling - Ben Affleck or Humphrey Bogart?
Funny that you mention the ceramic perpetual, which happens to be one of my three favorite current Glashüttes. This model has gotten very little attention . . .

. . . which is puzzling because it has both a deadly cool appearance and an eminently practical complication. Far be it for me to fathom the predilections of the Paneristis, but as far as I'm concerned, the ceramic perpetual evinces the same level of edgy utilitarian chic that Panerai is famous for, executed with typically German understatement. Are the differences between your "ideal" perpetual and the existent model significant enough to prevent you from taking the plunge? Cordially, Art
I did....
By: MiniCooper : June 14th, 2010-12:35
flirt with it briefly but decided against it..... I think that the complication does not suit a pilots watch.... Also the simplicity of the big date and the retro look of the base model are more attractive.... It seems though that GO does not manufacture ...
yes, considering it
By: mac : June 14th, 2010-13:15
I really like the style, aesthetics and the perpetual complication. I having doubts, however, about the combination. I associate perpetuals with dress watches and pilot watches are far removed from that. As a result, I wonder how well the design will age ...
One photo in my files . . .
By: Dr No : June 15th, 2010-23:35
. . . of the rose gold model, taken last year (sorry for the reflections). Funny that you mention the IWC Big Pilot perpetual; it seems considerably more complex, with a plethora of days, dates, and months printed on the dial. The Navigator is somewhat sm...
i've got one -
By: maikeru : June 15th, 2010-00:38
I believe there are two editions (at least) of this watch. I've got the limited edition RG one with the black dial from circa 2001 or 2002 (?). I'm not too keen on the recently released revision which, IMO, seems crowded and unbalanced. The one I've got, ...
Agree the older one is very nice
By: mac : June 16th, 2010-06:21
While I like the size and case style of the older version, I actually prefer the dial and hands of the new version. I like the use of the dark background (versus the white) in the date and other windows. I find it odd that GO doesn't use a black backgroun...
Thanks for bringing back . . .
By: Dr No : June 16th, 2010-10:17
. . . that blast from the past! I well remember revisiting that review many times. I had the opportunity to acquire one of the steel limited edition Navigator perpetuals when they were available from the dealer that commissioned them, but went for a rose ...
Perpetual
By: Le Chef : June 15th, 2010-06:50
I had always thought that as one of the great complications a perpetual should be a special occasion watch, but I've recently had a rethink. Surely this should be a complication you wear everyday? It's highly useful/practical from the point of view of the...