Costa (aka Connie)
1474
Patek 5170G vs 5140G
I have a first world dilemma. I am trying to choose between the perpetual calendar and the chronograph. I like a watch that is a little under the radar and has a reasonable mass on the wrist. I currently own 5146R and 5110J. Do you have any suggestions on ways to make the decision?
Here are pics of my 2 watches and the 5140G I tried on at the AD a few months ago.
Thanks very much,
CB



5170g
By: Jon17 : August 24th, 2016-18:43
There is some charm in having a Patek Philippe perpetual calendar but since you have an annual (5146) I suggest going for the 5170G, the black dial is my first choice. Cheers. Beautiful 5110 btw.
I am..
By: Chimaera : August 25th, 2016-00:01
...on a similar trajectory: 5146p then 3940g so next for me is a chrono. If you desire reasonable mass, I would suggest the chrono, but mainly because I\'m still not sold by the 5140 (versus 3940). Whatever you do, enjoy!
i would vote 5170G
By: keks : August 25th, 2016-01:18
I like both 5140G and 5170G a lot, but the 5170G is more different from what you have already in a number of ways. Manual movement as opposed to another 240 which you already have in your 5110. Different size and feel on the wrist. A classic chrono like 5...
Tough choice!
By: jon_jon : August 26th, 2016-21:30
Between the 5140G and the 5170G, it is a tough choice. A perpetual calendar and chronograph would add nicely to your existing collection. Perhaps you will add one now and add the other later. As you know, the 5140G has been discontinued, so it will be har...
Thank you all
By: Costa (aka Connie) : August 30th, 2016-11:15
I have decided to go with a 5170G. I like the fact that it is a hand wound movement which I do not have. I like the size, mass and thickness. It will complement my 5110J and 5146R very nicely as you all have pointed out. Also easier to come by compared to...