WatchProSite|Market|Digest
WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

Patek PCC advice needed.

 

Hi. I’ve always been a fan of the Patek perpetual calendars. Back when the 5970 was around, it was a dream watch - 40mm perfect symmetry. But alas I was poor. Then came the 5270 and I tried it on years ago, and now I’m in a position to purchase one 5270j from a good local AD. I know it’s not an investment piece. My biggest question however is regarding size, and would appreciate peoples thoughts on the size change from 40 to 41mm. It is thinner however. I’m 6foot tall but have small hands and wrist 15cm 6.25in. On a side note, its interesting that I have a 42mm/14mm skydweller and a 44mm/14mm YM2, and yet the YM2 feels more balanced on my wrist and the SD a little too heavy. It must be a proportions thing how some watches wear. Your advice on whether I should just go for the 5270j would be appreciate. I’m just not hopeful that future versions of the PPC will go back to a smaller diameter. Thanks!!

  login to reply
Related Content
expand_more
52705970Grand ComplicationsPatek Philippe
💰1729 Marketplace Listings for Patek Philippe›
From the Digest
Patek Philippe Ref. 5270G: An Unexpected Acquisition and Its Enduring Appeal
Collection
Patek Philippe Ref. 5270G: An Unexpected Acquisition and Its Enduring Appeal
holdemchamp1225 · May 18, 2021
Discover why the Patek Philippe Ref. 5270G is winning over collectors, featuring insights on its in-house movement, design, and place in horological history.
84 replies12137 views
10 Comments view entire thread 

3970

 
By: baufoam : July 20th, 2021-05:14
Go look at a 3970. Certainly you cannot buy them new from an AD any longer, but they are available. Try one on and see what you think. The 3970 is a 36mm watch, and they are perfectly sized for daily wear. Of course, if you are determined to buy a new, mo... 

I love the 5270

 
By: sham1 : July 20th, 2021-05:29
but at 41mm it is too large for my wrist. The 5270R I loved for a long time due to the vintage patina on the dial. There is a difference between the 5970 and 5270 not just by one millimeter but also the lugs. I would definitely suggest that you try on a 5... 

My humble opinion….

 
By: MTR : July 20th, 2021-07:42
You absolutely have to try the watch on your own wrist and let it work! It is a big investment, and you should really enjoy your new acquisition. Wearing comfort is essential to be able to enjoy a watch for many years (decades). All the best for your jour... 

Welcome to our forum. I'm entirely with Thomas (MTR) here, in that the best way is always to try a watch on your wrist if possible, especially one of this importance and/or for which you have concerns regarding wearability.

 
By: FabR : July 20th, 2021-08:25
While we are glad to provide some theoretical advice here, nothing can replace the certainty you will feel (or not feel! ;-) after comfortably trying a watch on your wrist....Assuming a 5270J is not physically at your AD yet, if you show a serious interes... 

Perhaps I am stating the obvious, but here goes. You describe the 5970 as a dream watch and at 40mm having perfect symmetry. But you say

 
By: patekova : July 20th, 2021-19:29
“when it WAS around”. But, it still IS around. If it is your dream watch why not buy a mint and complete 5970? Don’t get me wrong 5270 is a fantastic watch! Furthermore unlike 5970, the movement is totally in house which for many is a big plus. And yes, I...  

Thank you all.

 
By: WatchUC : July 20th, 2021-21:59
What great advice just over the last 24 hours. Sounds like I need to try it on the wrist for sure! I do wish to continue a good relationship with my AD.

Bigger is better- to a point

 
By: socal to az : July 21st, 2021-00:22
I might be one of the few folks around that prefers a bigger watch. I’m 6’4 and really the 42mm aquanauts- which I have a few (5968, 5168) wear just perfectly for me. I just picked up a 5270j and I will tell you it’s been a grail watch for me forever. How...