Marcus Hanke[PuristSPro Moderator]
11296
Ulysse Nardin Marine Diver "Black Sea" In-Depth Review, Part 2
Ulysse Nardin Marine Diver "Black Sea"
Test report by Marcus Hanke
Part 2
IV. Strap and clasp:
From
the beginning, the Marine Diver series offered a very unique rubber
strap, combined with metal links. While these and the twin folding clasp
normally are made from titanium, the “Black Sea” features black ceramic
parts, which not only look absolutely stunning, but are also more or
less scratch-proof. Even after digging in rocks and sand during a unique
off-road driving experience I could not find any damage to the ceramic
links.
However,
it is possible to scratch the material, since I somehow, at a later
time, must have brought a tiny scratch into a part of the clasp; not
really visible, though, and I really cannot recall the occasion when
this happened.
A comparison with the original rubber strap of a
decade ago reveals several changes: Aside the attractive wave pattern,
identical with that on the dial, the new rubber strap is slightly
thinner and softer, even more comfortable on the wrist. The twin-folding
clasp has become larger, and the titanium folding parts now have
smoothly rounded edges.
What
is still missing is a true quick-adjustment device for the strap
length. The rubber strap has to be cut into the correct length as
exactly as possible. After that, the only way to change the length, when
for example the wrist circumference increases on a hot summer day, is
by rearranging the spring bars in the clasp, which can be done only with
a sharply pointed tool, and at most results in an additional half
centimeter only. Since quick-adjustment devices integrated into the
folding clasps are increasingly common now, I think that Ulysse Nardin
should close up to the competitors in this respect.
V. Movement
The
“Black Sea” is powered by the well-known ETA 2892A2, complemented with a
module for the power reserve display and small second, which is
produced inhouse by Ulysse Nardin. Compared with early Marine Diver
vintages, the movement sports a more refined decoration, circular
stripes nicely match the decoration style used on UN’s own inhouse
movements as well. Additionally, a black coated rotor quotes the basic
colour of the “Black Sea” series.

Well polished screw heads are a part of the movement's overall good finish
The
ETA 2892 is a well-proven and reliable movement, and serves perfectly
as engine for the Marine series watches since about seventeen years.
However, due to the restrictive sales strategy of the Swatch Group
regarding movement kits, and Ulysse Nardin’s own efforts in developing
and producing movements, it is just a matter of time until the Marine
Diver will also receive the new Ulysse Nardin cal. 118 inhouse movement,
that was already shown as engine for the new Marine Chronometer in
Basel this year.
VI. Accuracy
It might not be
widely known that the term “chronometer” is not legally protected, so it
can be used to identify watches with movements that have not been
certified by the Swiss chronometry control institute, the COSC. In
recent times, the “Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres” has met
increasingly critical comments, mainly focussing on the testing
routines, and the fact that only the bare movements, without the watch
cases are tested. This principle ignores the possibility that certified
movements can be compromised during the encasing procedure.
Consequently, numerous watch manufacturers have decided not to send any
movements to the COSC, but rather subject them to their own testing
routines, that better reflect the practical situation of actually
wearing a watch.
However, the COSC tests have a big advantage:
Contrary to the companies’ testing methods, which remain unpublished,
the former are transparent through public documentation of processes and
value limits, and therefore its results are - at least partially -
comparable throughout the industry. This is also the reason why I am
generally following the COSC procedures during my own timing tests, with
slight modifications: I do not have a possibility to store watches for
several days at a constant temperature of 38 degrees Celsius, so I omit
the temperature tests. On the other hand, I test the watches in all four
vertical positions, not only in three, as is the case with the COSC
tests. Very important for me is the check of variations within the same
position over at least two days: A watch can be a great performer with a
gain of only one second during 24 hours, but has a serious problem if
it loses ten seconds in the same position over the next day.
Finally, the daily accuracy is also recorded when the watch is actively worn 24/7, with mostly full mainspring tension.
Having
said that, it should be noted that the “Black Sea”, while being marked
as “Chronometer”, does not have a movement certified by the COSC.
Nowhere on the dial is stated that the chronometer is “officially
certified”, instead the print says “Marine Diver Chronometer”.
I
have absolutely no reason to assume the internal accuracy testing
methods executed at the Ulysse Nardin factory to be in any way inferior
to those of the COSC - in the contrary: my recent visit showed a huge
battery of testing and timing machines, and I know that the fully
assembled watches spend a rather long time on these machines, and quite
frequently are returned to the watchmakers for additional adjustment,
when the test result protocols show a value that is out of the limits.
Yet I think that especially a company so tightly connected with the
history of chronometry as Ulysse Nardin should release a watch as
“chronometer” only when it has been certified by an independent
laboratory to fulfil the specifications of the international ISO 3159
standard for chronometers. Not necessarily this lab has to be the COSC,
even when there is barely an alternative for Swiss companies.
Regarding
the “Black Sea’s” accuracy performance, my tests showed it to be within
the COSC limits - barely. Two positions manifested an accuracy
variation of five seconds between the two test days, which is quite a
lot. The difference between horizontal and vertical is average, with 5
seconds, and the largest difference between the mean daily rate and the
actual daily rates in the various positions is more than 7 seconds. This
proves that the excellent mean daily rate in the various positions at
0.95 seconds per day does not tell the entire story, since the variance
of the measure results is considerable. Certainly there is some room for
improvement, but I have to state that my tests were conducted after I
subjected the watch to the environment tests mentioned in a previous
chapter. So there is a - slight, though - chance that one of the bumps
compromised the movement.
When
worn on the wrist all day long, the “Black Sea” gains an average 6
seconds per day, here the variance is small, with not more than two
seconds’ deviation from this mean value.
VII. Ergonomics
A. Legibility
Unlike
the all-black “stealth” watches that became popular in the last years,
and where the hands, too, are completely black, the bright red luminous
markers and zones on the hands offer a great contrast with the otherwise
black watch to permit a good reading of the time display. In this
respect, though, the hour and minute hands are compromised by the black
metal structure of the hands, which makes the red luminous parts stand
out seemingly disembodied, so a quick glance on the dial often is not
enough to sort out all the red elements of similar size and shape. Yet
this deliberate design “flaw” is a small trade-off, compared to its
stunning effect.
In
darkness, the red tinted SuperLuminova is bright enough for the eye to
permit a reading even after several hours. However, in comparison with
the highly capable and traditional C3 SuperLuminova, the luminosity of
any colour tinted SL is completely outclassed (see my comparison test report on various SL types, including the “Black Sea”: home.watchprosite.com
). The decreased luminosity is a price willingly paid for the red colour’s attractiveness.
Reading
the date is not very easy. Due to the mechanical module on the base
movement, the date is placed in a funnel. A loupe, grinded into the rear
side of the sapphire crystal, shall compensate this by optically
enlarging the figures. However, it also massively distorts them, and
even blocks the view as soon as one does not look at the date from
directly above.
B. Wearing comfort
At
first, I was a bit sceptical about the “Black Sea’s” large size. 45.6mm
diameter and more than 14mm height are some lump of metal, particularly
since the case is made from steel, not titanium. I was positively
surprised, though. Normally, I am wearing my watches rather loosely, so
the strap allows a pair of fingers to be inserted between it and the
wrist. Heavy watches then are often dangling around, and when this is
combined with large diameters, the crown collides with the back of the
palm. Not in this case, since the rubberized caseback prevents the watch
from skidding on the skin. Even when sweating on very hot and humid
summer days, this is not uncomfortable, in the contrary: I consider the
big “Black Sea” to be a perfect summer watch.
A
small disadvantage of the sticky rubber surface should not be left
aside: textiles do not glide over the case, so whenever you try to get
your shirt’s sleeve over the high case, you better do some planning
before, otherwise this procedure might result in a series of
funny-looking stretching moves. Also, the quick cleaning wipe over the
watch with a cloth will leave tiny fibres sticking to the case. These
are normally too small to see them with the naked eye. If you want a
really clean watch (for photography purposes, for example), better rinse
it with water, brush it and let it dry by the air.
What I really
love about this watch is that its rubber coat not only protects the
watch from damage, but also the furniture it comes into close contact
with. Large watches get often banged against door sills or furniture
pieces, and even if the timepieces get out of the collision without any
traces, this is not the case with the wooden furniture. More than once I
was annoyed about dings or scratches in my nice cherry-wood sideboard,
but the “Black Sea” really takes care for the fine pieces, and the dull
“whomp!” of the collision ends luckily for both parts.
VIII. Conclusion
I
tried to write this review as neutral and sober in style as possible.
However, the “Black Sea” unfolds its impact beyond the dry facts, and it
is very difficult, if not impossible to put this effect into words.
Collecting watches always is much more an emotional issue than pure
logic, and this watch is pure emotion. Its black and red colour scheme
makes it conspicuous, but not pretentious, it appears toolwatch-like,
but also fashionable. Added to this is the haptic experience of the
rubber, which lacks the cold smoothness of the steel under the rubber,
but is warm and soft. Yet there is still the weight of the steel watch,
and finally, the watch expresses utmost care in detail and value even in
the smallest parts, like the ceramic links with the black polished
screws in the rubber strap, or the polished black hands, that only stand
out when light hits them at the right angle, while otherwise, they
completely vanish and let the red luminous parts float above the black
dial.
I
admit to massively enjoy every moment wearing this watch, in my opinion
it is the most attractive sports watch I ever wore on my wrist. That I
am not alone with my opinion is shown by the many most favourable
comments I received, and the enthusiastic statements expressed by other
owners. Definitely, Ulysse Nardin has hit the nerve of the time with its
“Black Sea” series.
This message has been edited by Marcus Hanke on 2012-09-05 05:10:38 This message has been edited by MTF on 2012-09-13 12:11:01