Dr No[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
37599
I was similarly constrained a few years ago, Jon . . .
. . . as it came down to a choice between a rose gold Karree perpetual or the 04.0 . . . I simply didn't have the wherewithal for both, and passed on the 04.0 . . . at least Roger has one that I can see in the metal now and again. As for laying down guidelines regarding the nominal size of a watch, my feeling is that there are other factors that contribute to the sense of size, including color (darker generally appears smaller), proportion (thicker leading to an overall smaller impression), and finish (brushed/matte appears smaller) . . . a watch like the Senator Navigator actually works on my wrist despite it's nominal 44 mm diameter because other factors mitigate the diameter of the case . . . cordially, Art
A steel version of that beauty
By: bug : April 6th, 2008-03:37
would imho be a perfect daily wearer, those blued hands look so stunning on pictures, and would look very nice with a steel case. Would be perfect with manual wind and a display back. I'm aware that I just described a Dörnbluth, but they are just a tad to...
Agreed, Jon . . .
By: Dr No : April 6th, 2008-11:43
. . . although I would prefer a small seconds version of the cal 49 manual winding movement as well, I'll take this new iteration of the cal 100 if it's offered in brushed steel and not have any regrets ;-). The 1878 Moritz Grossman is listed at 40 mm, sa...
"The most perfect...
By: pplater : April 6th, 2008-03:54
...three-handed dress watch in my experience.." That's a big call Art - there'd be a few contenders in that bracket, wouldn't you say? (However, kudos for the premise implicit in your statement, to the effect that a dress watch may even have three hands: ...