Thank you for the explanation... two more questions...

Reading some posts here and found that Cal.100 generally has pretty good comments to be a successor to Cal.39. It looks like Cal. functions better and is also preciser. Why do old models with Cal.39 still hold value better than the new ones with Cal.100? Does "classic" simply outrun "functional"? How are the value of these watches evaluated?

Back to the original question of this post, I thought the discontinued model would require more works to make the dial more delicate than the current model. Isn't that the case? I understand that which one looks better depends on individual's taste, and thus I am simply asking the works / manufacturing process put to make the final product.

Thank you for helping with my newbie questions in advance.

Why GO discontinued the Senator Perpetual Celendar gray dial with guilloche deco model?

By: ney : February 7th, 2011-14:06

Hi New to here. I am considering buying GO perpetual calendar stainless steel version? Now I am debating between the regular model (the one still showed on GO website) and the discontinued model which has gray dial with guilloche deco (first released in 2...

Glashütte Original seems to turn over . . .

By: Dr No : February 7th, 2011-15:44

. . . their offerings at a much greater clip than, say, Rolex or Omega. I'm not positive about this, but I believe the PanoMatic Date and Lunar and PanoReserve are the current models with the greatest longevity, extending back to 2003. Every other model g...

Glashütte Original